These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

107 related items for PubMed ID: 8416561

  • 1. Nephrotoxicity of nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast media: a prospective double-blind randomized comparison in human beings.
    Katholi RE, Taylor GJ, Woods WT, Womack KA, Katholi CR, McCann WP, Moses HW, Dove JT, Mikell FL, Woodruff RC.
    Radiology; 1993 Jan; 186(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 8416561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Nephrotoxicity from contrast media: attenuation with theophylline.
    Katholi RE, Taylor GJ, McCann WP, Woods WT, Womack KA, McCoy CD, Katholi CR, Moses HW, Mishkel GJ, Lucore CL.
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 7892462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contrast nephrotoxicity: a randomized controlled trial of a nonionic and an ionic radiographic contrast agent.
    Schwab SJ, Hlatky MA, Pieper KS, Davidson CJ, Morris KG, Skelton TN, Bashore TM.
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Jan 19; 320(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 2643042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Nephrotoxicity of high and low osmolar contrast media: case control studies following digital subtraction angiography in potential risk patients.
    Scherberich JE, Fischer A, Rautschka E, Kollath J, Riemann H.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Jan 19; 128():91-4. PubMed ID: 2568816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Nephrotoxicity of high-osmolality versus low-osmolality contrast media: randomized clinical trial.
    Moore RD, Steinberg EP, Powe NR, Brinker JA, Fishman EK, Graziano S, Gopalan R.
    Radiology; 1992 Mar 19; 182(3):649-55. PubMed ID: 1535876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Contrast agent nephrotoxicity: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Stacul F, Carraro M, Magnaldi S, Faccini L, Guarnieri G, Dalla Palma L.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec 19; 149(6):1287-9. PubMed ID: 2891285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Acetylcysteine for prevention of acute deterioration of renal function following elective coronary angiography and intervention: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kay J, Chow WH, Chan TM, Lo SK, Kwok OH, Yip A, Fan K, Lee CH, Lam WF.
    JAMA; 2003 Feb 05; 289(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 12578487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Nephrotoxicity from contrast material in renal insufficiency: ionic versus nonionic agents.
    Harris KG, Smith TP, Cragg AH, Lemke JH.
    Radiology; 1991 Jun 05; 179(3):849-52. PubMed ID: 2028004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Hemodynamic effects of non-ionic iomeprol 350 and ionic diatrizoate 370 during levocardiography and coronary angiography--double-blind randomized comparison of 2 contrast media].
    Lins M, Röhling D, Zahorsky R, Höfig M, Herrmann G, Simon R.
    Z Kardiol; 1994 Sep 05; 83(9):626-33. PubMed ID: 7801664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Oxygen free radicals and contrast nephropathy.
    Katholi RE, Woods WT, Taylor GJ, Deitrick CL, Womack KA, Katholi CR, McCann WP.
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1998 Jul 05; 32(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 9669426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A randomized comparison of the nephrotoxicity of iopamidol and diatrizoate in high risk patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
    Taliercio CP, Vlietstra RE, Ilstrup DM, Burnett JC, Menke KK, Stensrud SL, Holmes DR.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Feb 05; 17(2):384-90. PubMed ID: 1991894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparative study of the nephrotoxicity of iohexol, iopamidol and ioxaglate in peripheral angiography.
    Campbell DR, Flemming BK, Mason WF, Jackson SA, Hirsch DJ, MacDonald KJ.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1990 Jun 05; 41(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 2354386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Tolerability of nonionic contrast media--results of a multicenter double blind study].
    Schmiedel E.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 May 05; 2(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 1610929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [The effects of contrast media on the cardiac conducting system in coronary angiography].
    Kawamori J.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Nov 25; 49(11):1372-81. PubMed ID: 2602100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
    Steinberg EP, Moore RD, Powe NR, Gopalan R, Davidoff AJ, Litt M, Graziano S, Brinker JA.
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb 13; 326(7):425-30. PubMed ID: 1732769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.