These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

379 related items for PubMed ID: 8421740

  • 21. Digital imaging with a photostimulable phosphor in the chest of newborns.
    Cohen MD, Katz BP, Kalasinski LA, White SJ, Smith JA, Long B.
    Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):829-32. PubMed ID: 1947105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
    Schäfer CB, Sokiranski R, Claussen CD.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Konen E, Greenberg I, Rozenman J.
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
    Körner M, Wirth S, Treitl M, Reiser M, Pfeifer KJ.
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M.
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparison of an asymmetric screen-film combination with a conventional screen-film combination for chest radiography in 51 patients.
    Greaney T, McCoy C, Masterson J.
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):929-32. PubMed ID: 9486069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Evaluation of resolution and sensitometric characteristics of an asymmetric screen-film imaging system.
    Gray JE, Stears JG, Swensen SJ, Bunch PC.
    Radiology; 1993 Aug; 188(2):537-9. PubMed ID: 8327711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP, Hartmann J, Freund MC, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M, Richter K.
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Ganten M, Radeleff B, Kampschulte A, Daniels MD, Kauffmann GW, Hansmann J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M, Reuter M, Palmié S, Harder E, Hutzelmann A, Heller M.
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters' perceptions of diagnostic quality.
    Fuhrman CR, Gur D, Good B, Rockette H, Cooperstein LA, Feist JH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3258701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk.
    Chotas HG, Floyd CE, Dobbins JT, Ravin CE.
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 8421741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Thoracic radiography in intensive care units. Comparison of an asymmetric film-screen-grid combination with an L-film].
    Luska G, von Boetticher H, Amling B, Herzog R.
    Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7670010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN, Brateman L, Arreola M.
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
    Kehler M, Lyttkens K, Andersson B, Hochbergs P, Lindberg CG, Medin J, Nordström AJ, Sanfridsson J, Vojciechowski J.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
    Dobbins JT, Rice JJ, Beam CA, Ravin CE.
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography.
    Morishita J, MacMahon H, Doi K, Carlin M, Sukenobu Y.
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 7891639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Detection of monitoring materials on bedside chest radiographs with the most recent generation of storage phosphor plates: dose increase does not improve detection performance.
    Eisenhuber E, Stadler A, Prokop M, Fuchsjager M, Weber M, Schaefer-Prokop C.
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):216-21. PubMed ID: 12668747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Digital radiography: comparison of different methods for imaging of the thorax and the gastrointestinal tracts.
    Busch HP.
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):8-10. PubMed ID: 7734546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Can digital luminescent radiography substitute for conventional x-ray technics in chest radiography?].
    Neufang KF, Krug B, Lorenz R, Steinbrich W.
    Rofo; 1990 May; 152(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 2160680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.