These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


249 related items for PubMed ID: 8433063

  • 1. Molar versus local reinforcement probability as determinants of stimulus value.
    Williams BA.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 8433063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.
    Preston RA, Fantino E.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):155-75. PubMed ID: 2037825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Choice behavior in transition: development of preference for the higher probability of reinforcement.
    Bailey JT, Mazur JE.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):409-22. PubMed ID: 2341823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU, Davison M, Elliffe DM.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J, Davison M, Elliffe D.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP, Zentall TR.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Preference and resistance to change with constant- and variable-duration terminal links: independence of reinforcement rate and magnitude.
    Grace RC, Bedell MA, Nevin JA.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 12083678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Choice as a function of local versus molar reinforcement contingencies.
    Williams BA.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov; 56(3):455-73. PubMed ID: 1774539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.
    Spetch ML, Dunn R.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jan; 47(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 3559459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.
    Mazur JE.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 8126393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dissociation of theories of choice by temporal spacing of choice opportunities.
    Williams BA.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 1619396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.