These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

169 related items for PubMed ID: 8445608

  • 1. Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.
    Rivlin ME, Woodliff JM, Bowlin RB, Moore JL, Martin RW, Grossman JH, Morrison JC.
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Feb; 38(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8445608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ, Johnson RA, McNicoll KE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B, Gearhart J, Evers CG, Cason Z, Replogle WH.
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.
    Germain M, Heaton R, Erickson D, Henry M, Nash J, O'Connor D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
    Stillson T, Knight AL, Elswick RK.
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP, Dickinson K, d'Ablaing G, Schlaerth JB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG, Sadeghi M, Fotheringham N, Semrad N, Watring WG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
    Partoll LM, Javaheri G.
    Acta Cytol; 1993 Nov; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.
    Trimbos JB, Arentz NP.
    Acta Cytol; 1986 Nov; 30(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 3521175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB, Hølund B, Grinsted P.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Nov; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
    Hoffman MS, Hill DA, Gordy LW, Lane J, Cavanagh D.
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A, Cuzick J, Singer A.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Apr; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
    Altermatt HJ, Wyler K, Fravi R, Liu X, Kraft R, Dreher E.
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun 11; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
    Kristensen GB, Jensen LK, Ejersbo D, Hølund B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Jun 11; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
    Helderman G, Graham L, Cannon D, Waters K, Feller D.
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov 11; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A, De Marchi WG, Bell V, Nishikawa R.
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb 01; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Cytobrush quality assurance in endocervical smears].
    Kerl J, Ross A, Hilgarth M.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Jan 01; 51(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 2026300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
    Harrison DD, Hernandez E, Dunton CJ.
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr 01; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Improved endocervical cell yield with Cytobrush.
    Deckert JJ, Staten SF, Palermo V.
    J Fam Pract; 1988 Jun 01; 26(6):639-41. PubMed ID: 3379366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.