These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

272 related items for PubMed ID: 8448777

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A, Jones C.
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A, Svanaes DB, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Gröndahl HG.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
    Versteeg KH, Sanderink GC, Velders XL, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.
    Cederberg RA, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Shulman JD.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries.
    Pontual AA, de Melo DP, de Almeida SM, Bóscolo FN, Haiter Neto F.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K, Parker ME, Nortje CJ, Sanderink GC.
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Diagnostic performance of radiovisiography in combination with a diagnosis assisting program versus conventional radiography and radiovisiography in basic mode and with magnification.
    Forner Navarro L, Llena Puy MC, García Godoy F.
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 Apr 01; 13(4):E261-5. PubMed ID: 18379453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ, Akdevelioğlu M, Güngör K, Erten H.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec 01; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB, Moystad A, Larheim TA.
    Caries Res; 2000 Dec 01; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.