These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
92 related items for PubMed ID: 8464545
1. Specific features of the electroretinogram of vertebrates induced by X-rays. Savchenko BN. Neurosci Behav Physiol; 1993; 23(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8464545 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The specific characteristics of the vertebrate electroretinogram evoked by x-rays]. Savchenko BN. Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1991 Aug; 77(8):99-106. PubMed ID: 1668593 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The comparative characteristics of the electroretinograms of vertebrates evoked by light and x-ray stimulation under different conditions of adaptation]. Savchenko BN, Zavarina LB, Nozdrachev AD. Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 1994 Sep; 80(9):13-21. PubMed ID: 7536570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effect of sodium azide on the steady potential and on the electroretinogram of the dark adapted isolated frog retina without pigment epithelium]. Höhne W. Acta Biol Med Ger; 1971 Sep; 27(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 5317066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Photopic c-wave in the chicken ERG: sensitivity to sodium azide, epinephrine, sodium iodate, barbiturates, and other general anesthetics. Wioland N, Bonaventure N. Doc Ophthalmol; 1985 Oct 15; 60(4):407-12. PubMed ID: 4064880 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Electroretinogram in response to x-ray stimulation. BACHOFER CS, WITTRY SE. Science; 1961 Mar 03; 133(3453):642-4. PubMed ID: 13685657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of stimulus energies required to elicit the ERG in response to x-rays and to light. BACHOFER CS, WITTRY SE. J Gen Physiol; 1962 Nov 03; 46(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 13965919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The c-wave of the electroretinogram possesses a third component from the proximal retina. Zeumer C, Hanitzsch R, Mättig WU. Vision Res; 1994 Oct 03; 34(20):2673-8. PubMed ID: 7975304 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial properties of the oscillatory potentials of the frog electroretinogram in relation to state of adaptation. Wachtmeister L, Hahn I. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1987 Dec 03; 65(6):724-30. PubMed ID: 3501666 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Amplitude increase of the multifocal electroretinogram during light adaptation. Kondo M, Miyake Y, Piao CH, Tanikawa A, Horiguchi M, Terasaki H. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Oct 03; 40(11):2633-7. PubMed ID: 10509660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Slow P III component of the electroretinogram resulting from the interaction of photoreceptors and cells of Müller in the retina]. Dmitriev AV, Bykov KA, Skachkov SN. Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1985 Apr 03; 71(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 3873364 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of bimodal stimuli in the frog retina. Izmailov ChA, Zimachev MM. Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2008 Feb 03; 38(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 18197374 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Modification of electroretinograms in dopamine-depleted retinas. Citron MC, Erinoff L, Rickman DW, Brecha NC. Brain Res; 1985 Oct 14; 345(1):186-91. PubMed ID: 3933762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]