These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

406 related items for PubMed ID: 8466401

  • 21. College of American Pathologists-Centers for Disease Control collaborative study for evaluating reference materials for total serum cholesterol measurements.
    Myers GL, Schap D, Smith SJ, Cooper GR, Hartmann AE, Gilmore B, Suenram CA, Ray DH.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Dec; 114(12):1199-205. PubMed ID: 2252414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Intralaboratory analytic precision as estimated from two distinct programs from the College of American Pathologists.
    Platt R, Batsakis JG.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Oct; 76(4 Suppl):578-80. PubMed ID: 7282644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The detection of problem analytes in a single proficiency test challenge in the absence of the Health Care Financing Administration rule violations.
    Cembrowski GS, Hackney JR, Carey N.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 8466413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Use of survey-validated reference materials (survey serum) to establish target values of quality control pools.
    Grannis GF.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1978 Sep; 70(3 Suppl):580-3. PubMed ID: 707426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Multiprogram characterization of laboratory bias, precision, and total error. Proposal for improved assessment with shared external and expanded internal (regional) quality control pools.
    Lawson NS, Gilmore BF, Tholen DW.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 3355348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Reference values and participant means as targets in proficiency testing.
    Tholen DW.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Sep; 117(9):885-9. PubMed ID: 8368899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Analytic goals, concentration relationships, and the state of the art for clinical laboratory precision.
    Ross JW, Lawson NS.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 119(6):495-513. PubMed ID: 7605165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Proposed goals for analytical precision and accuracy in single-point diagnostic testing. Theoretical basis and comparison with data from College of American Pathologists proficiency surveys.
    Harris EK.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 3355343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Reference system for cholesterol measurements.
    Cooper GR, Myers GL.
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1990 Apr; 198():27-31. PubMed ID: 2189207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [How external quality evaluation programs affect the quality of laboratory results in routine practice in the Czech Republic].
    Valík D, Nekulová M, Pecen L, Votavová I.
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2001 Aug 30; 140(17):538-44. PubMed ID: 11702480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Accuracy of participant results utilized as target values in the CAP Chemistry Survey Program.
    Hartmann AE, Naito HK, Burnett RW, Welch MJ.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1985 Oct 30; 109(10):894-903. PubMed ID: 3840001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Quality assurance in hemostasis: the perspective from the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program.
    Cunningham MT, Brandt JT, Chandler WL, Eby CS, Hayes TE, Krishnan J, Lefkowitz JB, Olson JD, Stasik CJ, Teruya J, Van Cott EM.
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2007 Apr 30; 33(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17427059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Practical aspects of internal quality assurance.
    Uldall A.
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991 Apr 30; 27(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 1809060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Reasons for proficiency testing failures in clinical chemistry and blood gas analysis: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study in 665 laboratories.
    Steindel SJ, Howanitz PJ, Renner SW, College of American Pathologists.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Dec 30; 120(12):1094-101. PubMed ID: 15456173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Calibration verification for Olympus and Hitachi automatic biochemistry analyzers using albumin.
    Zhou Q, Li X, Xie W, Xu J, Li S, Guo J.
    Clin Lab; 2012 Dec 30; 58(1-2):153-9. PubMed ID: 22372358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The need for accurate total cholesterol measurement. Recommended analytical goals, current state of reliability, and guidelines for better determinations.
    Naito HK.
    Clin Lab Med; 1989 Mar 30; 9(1):37-60. PubMed ID: 2647375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Problems in formulating method-insensitive proficiency testing materials.
    Posner A.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr 30; 117(4):422-4. PubMed ID: 8466407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A theoretical basis for clinically relevant proficiency testing evaluation limits. Sensitivity analysis of the effect of inherent test variability on acceptable method error.
    Ross JW.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr 30; 112(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 3355344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Bedside glucose monitoring. Comparison of performance as studied by the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes program.
    Howanitz PJ, Jones BA.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Apr 30; 120(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 8619743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The usefulness of calibration verification and linearity surveys in predicting acceptable performance in graded proficiency tests.
    Lum G, Tholen DW, Floering DA.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 May 30; 119(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 7748066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.