These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
975 related items for PubMed ID: 8469251
1. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease. Hammermeister KE, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Oprian C, Kim T, Rahimtoola S. N Engl J Med; 1993 May 06; 328(18):1289-96. PubMed ID: 8469251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Ruel M, Kulik A, Rubens FD, Bédard P, Masters RG, Pipe AL, Mesana TG. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar 06; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients. Kulik A, Bédard P, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Masters RG, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep 06; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Choice of replacement valve in the elderly. Kobayashi Y, Eishi K, Nagata S, Nakano K, Sasako Y, Kobayashi J, Kosakai Y, Miyatake K. J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul 06; 6(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 9263873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes? Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, McCrindle BW, Canver CC, Sallehuddin A, Al-Oufi S, Joufan M, Al-Halees Z. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul 06; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience. Goldsmith I, Lip GY, Mukundan S, Rosin MD. J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep 06; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement. Khan SS, Trento A, DeRobertis M, Kass RM, Sandhu M, Czer LS, Blanche C, Raissi S, Fontana GP, Cheng W, Chaux A, Matloff JM. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug 06; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults. Ruel M, Kulik A, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Masters RG, Bédard P, Mesana TG. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar 06; 27(3):425-33; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 15740951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Valve type and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in older patients. Schelbert EB, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS, Welke KF, Rosenthal GE. Heart; 2008 Sep 06; 94(9):1181-8. PubMed ID: 18070945 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly. Davis EA, Greene PS, Cameron DE, Gott VI, Laschinger JC, Stuart RS, Sussman MS, Watkins L, Baumgartner WA. Circulation; 1996 Nov 01; 94(9 Suppl):II121-5. PubMed ID: 8901731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years. Stassano P, Di Tommaso L, Monaco M, Iorio F, Pepino P, Spampinato N, Vosa C. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov 10; 54(20):1862-8. PubMed ID: 19892237 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves. Hartz RS, Fisher EB, Finkelmeier B, DeBoer A, Sanders JH, Moran JM, Michaelis LL. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun 10; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses. Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Robbins RC, Reitz BA, Shumway NE. Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov 10; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H, Rudolph W. Herz; 1986 Apr 10; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: time-related outcomes and risk factors. Alsoufi B, Al-Halees Z, Fadel B, Al-Wesabi A, Al-Ahmadi M, Joufan M, Siblini G, Canver CC. J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May 10; 19(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 20583397 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study. Bernal JM, Rabasa JM, Cagigas JC, Echevarria JR, Carrion MF, Revuelta JM. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 May 10; 101(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 2023444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome. Kuwaki K, Tsukamoto M, Komatsu K, Morishita K, Sakata J, Abe T. J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar 10; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The long term (15 years) evolution after valvular replacement with mechanical prosthesis or bioprosthesis between the age of 60 and 70 years]. Hanania G, Michel PL, Montély JM, Warembourg H, Nardi O, Leguerrier A, Agnino A, Despins P, Legault B, Petit H, Bouraindeloup M, Groupe de travail sur les valvulopathies de la Société française de cardiologie. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2004 Jan 10; 97(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15002704 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance. Jamieson WR, Allen P, Miyagishima RT, Gerein AN, Munro AI, Burr LH, Tyers GF. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Mar 10; 99(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 2308373 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Mykén PS. J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul 10; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]