These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

975 related items for PubMed ID: 8469251

  • 21. Early and late risk of aortic valve replacement. A 12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and tilting disc prosthetic aortic valves.
    Cohn LH, Allred EN, DiSesa VJ, Sawtelle K, Shemin RJ, Collins JJ.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):695-705. PubMed ID: 6492838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses.
    Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mazzucco A, Valfré C, Talenti E, Guerra F, Thiene G, Gallucci V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Oct; 90(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 4046622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
    David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Feindel CM, Cohen G.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
    Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, Prescott RJ, Miller HC.
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb 28; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Aortic valve replacement: choice between mechanical valves and bioprostheses.
    Silberman S, Oren A, Dotan M, Merin O, Fink D, Deeb M, Bitran D.
    J Card Surg; 2008 Feb 28; 23(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 18462345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Prospective randomized comparison of CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses: ten-year follow-up.
    Bryan AJ, Rogers CA, Bayliss K, Wild J, Angelini GD.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Mar 28; 133(3):614-22. PubMed ID: 17320553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.
    Brown ML, Schaff HV, Lahr BD, Mullany CJ, Sundt TM, Dearani JA, McGregor CG, Orszulak TA.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr 28; 135(4):878-84; discussion 884. PubMed ID: 18374773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Early and late results with combined mitral and aortic valve replacement.
    Matsuyoshi T, Kimura M, Tachikawa Y, Nakamura M, Iwakuma A, Morishige N, Nakamura K, Sukehiro S, Kawano Y, Anai K.
    Igaku Kenkyu; 1993 Sep 28; 63(3):85-94. PubMed ID: 8023654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
    Legarra JJ, Llorens R, Catalan M, Segura I, Trenor AM, de Buruaga JS, Rabago G, Sarralde A.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan 28; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.
    McClure RS, Narayanasamy N, Wiegerinck E, Lipsitz S, Maloney A, Byrne JG, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Cohn LH.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May 28; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Long-term clinical results after aortic valve replacement with mechanical heart valves and mitral valve replacement with porcine valves].
    Okamura K, Atsumi N, Jikuya T, Sakakibara Y, Tsutsui T, Mitsui T, Hori M.
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Jun 28; 93(6):639-45. PubMed ID: 1630439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Long-term clinical results of tricuspid valve replacement.
    Chang BC, Lim SH, Yi G, Hong YS, Lee S, Yoo KJ, Kang MS, Cho BK.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Apr 28; 81(4):1317-23, discussion 1323-4. PubMed ID: 16564264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis in the mitral position: a 10-year follow up of St. Jude Medical and Biocor valves.
    Demirag M, Kirali K, Omeroglu SN, Mansuroglu D, Akinci E, Ipek G, Berki T, Gürbüz A, Isik O, Yakut C.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan 28; 10(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11206772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Ten year durability and performance of porcine bioprostheses.
    Miller DC, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Shumway NE.
    Z Kardiol; 1985 Jan 28; 74 Suppl 6():15-8. PubMed ID: 4096073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
    Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Caprili L, Testolin L, Thiene G, Gerosa G.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul 28; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 49.