These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

103 related items for PubMed ID: 8473595

  • 1. Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: in vivo wear.
    Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G.
    J Dent; 1993 Apr; 21(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 8473595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: SEM study of differential wear.
    Willems G, Lambrechts P, Lesaffre E, Braem M, Vanherle G.
    J Dent; 1993 Apr; 21(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 8473596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Three-year occlusal wear of posterior composite restorations.
    Freilich MA, Goldberg AJ, Gilpatrick RO, Simonsen RJ.
    Dent Mater; 1992 Jul; 8(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 1345041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of four composite resins in posterior teeth. Five-year results.
    Tyas MJ, Wassenaar P.
    Aust Dent J; 1991 Oct; 36(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 1836723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C, Rêgo HM, Perote LC, Santos LF, Kamozaki MB, Gutierrez NC, Di Nicoló R, Borges AB.
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U, van Dijken JW.
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1547-58. PubMed ID: 26363442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
    Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R.
    J Adhes Dent; 2001 Dec; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The clinical wear of three posterior composites.
    Mair LH, Vowles RW, Cunningham J, Williams DF.
    Br Dent J; 2001 Dec; 169(11):355-60. PubMed ID: 2275836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Three-year randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations.
    Palaniappan S, Elsen L, Lijnen I, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Aug; 14(4):441-58. PubMed ID: 19669176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Using a new condensable composite for posterior restorations.
    Poss SD.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999 Aug; (23):S14-8. PubMed ID: 12089754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV, Blaser PK, Watson RE, Mjör IA, McEdward DL, Sensi LG, Riley JL.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.