These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
256 related items for PubMed ID: 8474205
1. Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care. Benshoof J. JAMA; 1993 May 05; 269(17):2249-57. PubMed ID: 8474205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right. Benshoof J. Womens Health Issues; 1993 May 05; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences. Koslov TI. Law Med Health Care; 1992 May 05; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond. Martin PA. Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993 May 05; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court, abortion, and the jurisprudence of class. Mariner WK. Am J Public Health; 1992 Nov 05; 82(11):1556-62. PubMed ID: 1443311 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D. J Policy Anal Manage; 1993 Nov 05; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Supreme Court. Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun 29; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion law today. Field MA. J Leg Med; 1993 Mar 29; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process. Goldstein RD. William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996 Mar 29; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Fed Report; 1991 Oct 21; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end? Henry KS. Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1991 Oct 21; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law. Berlin SI. Second Opin; 1993 Jan 21; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A. J Leg Med; 1995 Dec 21; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade. Robertson JA. Hastings Cent Rep; 1992 Dec 21; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Dworkin and Casey on abortion. Stroud S. Philos Public Aff; 1996 Dec 21; 25(2):140-70. PubMed ID: 11660187 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. Fed Suppl; 1990 Aug 24; 744():1323-98. PubMed ID: 11648591 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Workability of the undue burden test. Schneider EA. Temple Law Rev; 1993 Aug 24; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Limiting state regulation of reproductive decisions. Glantz LH. Am J Public Health; 1984 Feb 24; 74(2):168-9. PubMed ID: 6691534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]