These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
141 related items for PubMed ID: 8475301
21. Full-size digital storage phosphor chest radiography: effect of 4K versus 2K matrix size on observer performance in detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities. Ueguchi T, Johkoh T, Tomiyama N, Honda O, Mihara N, Hamada S, Murai S, Ogata Y, Matsumoto M, Nakamura H. Radiat Med; 2005 May; 23(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 15940063 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom. Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Börjesson J, Mattsson S, Schlossman D. Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Digital chest radiography: comparison of unprocessed and processed images in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules. Correa J, Souto M, Tahoces PG, Malagari KS, Tucker DM, Larkin JJ, Kuhlman J, Barnes GT, Zerhouni EA, Fraser RG. Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):253-8. PubMed ID: 7892481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study. Hayrapetian A, Aberle DR, Huang HK, Fiske R, Morioka C, Valentino D, Boechat MI. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 2705346 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography. Konen E, Greenberg I, Rozenman J. Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization]. Redlich U, Hoeschen C, Effenberger O, Fessel A, Preuss H, Reissberg S, Scherlach C, Döhring W. Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Image quality for five modern chest radiography techniques: a modified FROC study with an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Lanhede B, Tylén U. Eur Radiol; 1999 Feb; 9(9):1826-34. PubMed ID: 10602958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system]. Busch HP, Hartmann J, Freund MC, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M, Richter K. Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A fully automated adaptive unsharp masking technique in digital chest radiograph. Abe K, Katsuragawa S, Sasaki Y, Yanagisawa T. Invest Radiol; 1992 Jan; 27(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 1733884 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules. Kelcz F, Zink FE, Peppler WW, Kruger DG, Ergun DL, Mistretta CA. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance. Thaete FL, Fuhrman CR, Oliver JH, Britton CA, Campbell WL, Feist JH, Straub WH, Davis PL, Plunkett MB. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance. Miró SP, Leung AN, Rubin GD, Choi YH, Kee ST, Mindelzun RE, Stark P, Wexler L, Plevritis SK, Betts BJ. Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]