These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

152 related items for PubMed ID: 8478170

  • 1. Patient choice and nonionic contrast media.
    Hopper KD, Matthews YL.
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Apr; 28(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 8478170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of informed consent on the level of anxiety in patients given i.v. contrast material.
    Hopper KD, Houts PS, TenHave TR, Matthews YL, Colon E, Haseman DB, Hartzel J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):531-5. PubMed ID: 8109491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.
    Barrett BJ, Parfrey PS, Vavasour HM, O'Dea F, Kent G, Stone E.
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb 13; 326(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 1732770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Use of informed consent for ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Lambe HA, Hopper KD, Matthews YL.
    Radiology; 1992 Jul 13; 184(1):145-8. PubMed ID: 1609071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Patients' attitudes toward informed consent for intravenous contrast media.
    Hopper KD, Houts PS, McCauslin MA, Matthews YL, Sefczek RJ.
    Invest Radiol; 1992 May 13; 27(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 1582819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Contrast agents for cardiac catheterization: conceptions and misconceptions.
    Brogan WC, Hillis LD, Lange RA.
    Am Heart J; 1991 Oct 13; 122(4 Pt 1):1129-35. PubMed ID: 1927863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Economics and efficacy of the use of contrast media].
    Seyferth W.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Nov 13; 1(6):294-7. PubMed ID: 1821632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
    Gavant ML, Ellis JV, Klesges LM.
    Radiology; 1992 Mar 13; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Readability of informed consent forms for use with iodinated contrast media.
    Hopper KD, Lambe HA, Shirk SJ.
    Radiology; 1993 Apr 13; 187(1):279-83. PubMed ID: 8451429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Spiral CT with ionic and nonionic contrast material: evaluation of patient motion and scan quality.
    Stockberger SM, Hicklin JA, Liang Y, Wass JL, Ambrosius WT.
    Radiology; 1998 Mar 13; 206(3):631-6. PubMed ID: 9494478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.