These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

185 related items for PubMed ID: 8482145

  • 21. Endorectal ultrasound in the management of patients with malignant rectal polyps.
    García-Aguilar J, Hernández de Anda E, Rothenberger DA, Finne CO, Madoff RD.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 May; 48(5):910-6; discussion 916-7. PubMed ID: 15868240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [The value and limits of endorectal sonography in the preoperative stage classification of rectal cancer].
    Badea R, Badea G, Philippi W, Dejica D, Bologa S, Cazacu M.
    Ultraschall Med; 1988 Dec; 9(6):265-9. PubMed ID: 3070750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [10 years experiences with transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Histopathologic and clinical analysis].
    Said S, Stippel D.
    Chirurg; 1996 Feb; 67(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 8881210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound, three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound, and endorectal MRI in the preoperative evaluation of rectal tumors. Preliminary results.
    Hünerbein M, Pegios W, Rau B, Vogl TJ, Felix R, Schlag PM.
    Surg Endosc; 2000 Nov; 14(11):1005-9. PubMed ID: 11116406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Staging rectal carcinoma with endorectal imaging: how much detail do we really need?
    de Lange EE.
    Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):633-5. PubMed ID: 8115601
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Strengths and weaknesses of endorectal ultrasonography].
    Herzog U, von Flüe M, Tan KG, Tondelli P, Boss M, Spichtin HP.
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1993 May 29; 123(21):1111-4. PubMed ID: 8511544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Efficacy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma.
    Jabbar AA.
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Nov 29; 27(11):1781. PubMed ID: 17106571
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in the locoregional staging of rectal carcinoma].
    Masi A, Olmastroni M, Lascialfari L, Messerini L, Fucini C, Cataliotti L, Ficari F, Tonelli F.
    Radiol Med; 1995 Oct 29; 90(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 8552820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Local excision of rectal tumors. Indications, preoperative diagnosis, surgical technique and results].
    Heintz A, Braunstein S, Menke H.
    Med Klin (Munich); 1992 May 15; 87(5):236-41. PubMed ID: 1614369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.