These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 8491328

  • 1. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Fokke HE, Salvatore CM, Schipper ME, Bleker OP.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Feb; 48(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 8491328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.
    Kavak ZN, Eren F, Pekin S, Küllü S.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Nov; 35(4):446-9. PubMed ID: 8717577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Sampling accuracy of the modified Ayre spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush versus the modified Ayre spatula/bulb aspirator in the collection of cells from the uterine cervix.
    Selvaggi SM, Malviya V.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1991 Nov; 7(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 1879271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG, Sadeghi M, Fotheringham N, Semrad N, Watring WG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A, De Marchi WG, Bell V, Nishikawa R.
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb 01; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A, Cuzick J, Singer A.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Feb 01; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A randomized comparative trial of the performance of the Ayre and the Armovical cervical spatulae.
    Bounds W, Grubb C, Metaxas N, Vessey M.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1976 Dec 01; 83(12):981-7. PubMed ID: 1009036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the effect of the sampling sequence.
    Noel ML, Kazal LA, Glenday MC.
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1993 Dec 01; 6(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 8452061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.