These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

94 related items for PubMed ID: 8496732

  • 1. Comparison of the marginal and axial wall integrity of in vivo and in vitro made adhesive class V restorations.
    Abdalla AI, Davidson CL.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1993 May; 20(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 8496732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ, Prieto LT, Araújo CT, Paulillo LA.
    Oper Dent; 2012 May; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations.
    Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Lösche GM, Wernecke KD, Roulet JF.
    Oper Dent; 2000 May; 25(5):401-10. PubMed ID: 11203848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage.
    Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ, Smale I.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H.
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V restorations.
    Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Davidson CL.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Apr; 10(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 9545892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S, Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Apr; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.