These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1452 related items for PubMed ID: 8497353

  • 1. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM, Antsaklis A, Varvarigos I, Papas C, Sofatzis I, Montgomery JT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Graham EM, Petersen SM, Christo DK, Fox HE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Guzman ER, Knuppel RA, Lake M, Schifrin BS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 7800313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD, Clark SM, Munn MB.
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor.
    Luthy DA, Shy KK, van Belle G, Larson EB, Hughes JP, Benedetti TJ, Brown ZA, Effer S, King JF, Stenchever MA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 3554055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
    Sandmire HF, DeMott RK.
    Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns.
    Garite TJ, Dildy GA, McNamara H, Nageotte MP, Boehm FH, Dellinger EH, Knuppel RA, Porreco RP, Miller HS, Sunderji S, Varner MW, Swedlow DB.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1049-58. PubMed ID: 11084540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update.
    Thacker SB, Stroup DF, Peterson HB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 86(4 Pt 1):613-20. PubMed ID: 7675390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Clinical use of central electronic monitoring system].
    Guo X, Xu H, Xie K.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11831942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Electronic fetal monitoring during labor.
    Kurse J.
    J Fam Pract; 1982 Jul; 15(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 7086382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns: a randomized controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry.
    Kühnert M, Schmidt S.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):1989-95. PubMed ID: 15592281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.
    Devane D, Lalor J, Bonnar J.
    Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Impact of fetal blood sampling on vaginal delivery and neonatal outcome in deliveries complicated by pathologic fetal heart rate: a population based cohort study.
    Stein W, Hellmeyer L, Misselwitz B, Schmidt S.
    J Perinat Med; 2006 Feb; 34(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 17140298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M, Shelton J, Fleming E.
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T, Freeman RK.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prevention of cerebral palsy during labour: role of foetal lactate.
    Borruto F, Comparetto C, Treisser A.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jul; 278(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18071726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Prevention of perinatal asphyxia. Can more be done by fetal monitoring?].
    Herbst A.
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug 09; 97(32-33):3484-8. PubMed ID: 11037592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Does centralized monitoring affect perinatal outcome?
    Weiss PM, Balducci J, Reed J, Klasko SK, Rust OA.
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1997 Aug 09; 6(6):317-9. PubMed ID: 9438212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: distribution's role in predicting fetal outcome.
    Myles TD, Strassner HT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Nov 09; 80(5):769-74. PubMed ID: 1407913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Breech delivery and foetal outcome: a review of 291 cases.
    Mekbib TA.
    Ethiop Med J; 1995 Jul 09; 33(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 7588656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 73.