These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

178 related items for PubMed ID: 8501736

  • 1. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
    Harrison DD, Hernandez E, Dunton CJ.
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG, Sadeghi M, Fotheringham N, Semrad N, Watring WG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush.
    Taylor PT, Andersen WA, Barber SR, Covell JL, Smith EB, Underwood PB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
    Partoll LM, Javaheri G.
    Acta Cytol; 1993 Nov; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.
    Trimbos JB, Arentz NP.
    Acta Cytol; 1986 Nov; 30(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 3521175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B, Gearhart J, Evers CG, Cason Z, Replogle WH.
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Nylon brush improves collection of cervical cytologic specimens.
    Dotters DJ, Carney CN, Droegemueller W.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Oct; 159(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 3177528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB, Hølund B, Grinsted P.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Oct; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
    Altermatt HJ, Wyler K, Fravi R, Liu X, Kraft R, Dreher E.
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun 11; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.