These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

110 related items for PubMed ID: 8508847

  • 1. Automatic film processors' quality control test in Greek military hospitals.
    Lymberis C, Efstathopoulos EP, Manetou A, Poudridis G.
    Eur J Radiol; 1993 Apr; 16(3):246-9. PubMed ID: 8508847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of poor control of film processors on mammographic image quality.
    Kimme-Smith C, Sun H, Bassett LW, Gold RH.
    Radiographics; 1992 Nov; 12(6):1137-46. PubMed ID: 1439016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The evaluation of a clinical thermometer for measuring developer temperature in automatic film processors.
    Wilson WB, Haus AG, Nierman C, Lillie R, Batz T, Moore R.
    Med Phys; 1993 Nov; 20(3):823-4. PubMed ID: 8350843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Using the "STEP Test" to evaluate processing speed in Moroccan hospitals.
    Nfaoiu K, Bentayeb F, Basraoui O, Azevedo AC.
    Phys Med; 2010 Nov; 26(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 19963422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessment of mammographic film processor performance in a hospital and mobile screening unit.
    Murray JG, Dowsett DJ, Laird O, Ennis JT.
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Dec; 65(780):1097-101. PubMed ID: 1286417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Film processor quality assurance: increasing reliability while decreasing costs.
    Adams MJ, Barsotti JB, Kohler TD, Reel LA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):709-10. PubMed ID: 8079873
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Experiences with processing control in the radiology department of a large municipal hospital].
    von Volkmann T, Piasecki M, Kugler B, Hammacher A, Klotz E.
    Rontgenblatter; 1986 Dec; 39(12):362-6. PubMed ID: 3809923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Analysis of an image quality assurance program.
    Göthlin JH, Alders B.
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 4029161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Developing solutions for dental X-ray processors.
    Hedin M.
    Swed Dent J; 1989 Aug; 13(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 2603130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Daily quality control programme in mammography.
    Nassivera E, Nardin L.
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):148-52. PubMed ID: 8785643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Results of a program of quality control in radiodiagnosis].
    Belletti S, Catolla Cavalcanti R, Gallini R, Giugni U.
    Radiol Med; 1983 Apr; 69(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 6856887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of solution depletion on films developed in the Peri-Pro automatic processor.
    Thunthy KH, Weinberg R.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 6582420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film.
    Matthee MJ, Becker PJ, Seeliger JE.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.