These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

138 related items for PubMed ID: 8508881

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
    Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Boon ME.
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Exact Touch: a new device for cervical cytology. Comparison with Ayre spatula plus Cytobrush.
    de Palo G, Stefanon B, Alasio L, Pilotti S.
    Cytopathology; 2000 Oct; 11(5):322-5. PubMed ID: 11014659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.
    Martin-Hirsch P, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000 Oct; 2000(2):CD001036. PubMed ID: 10796736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Follow-up Papanicolaou smear for cervical atypia: are we missing significant disease? A HARNET Study.
    Slawson DC, Bennett JH, Herman JM.
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Mar; 36(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 8454975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ, Johnson RA, McNicoll KE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Prevention of cervix cancer. Comparison of the sample quality obtained using cotton swab or cervical brush].
    Redondo Horcajo AM, Guerra Merino A, Pinedo Garrido G, García Aranda R.
    Aten Primaria; 2000 Jun 15; 26(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 10916900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.
    Kavak ZN, Eren F, Pekin S, Küllü S.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Nov 15; 35(4):446-9. PubMed ID: 8717577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Evaluation of the CytoRich technique for cervical smears.
    Stevens MW, Nespolon WW, Milne AJ, Rowland R.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Mar 15; 18(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 9523146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
    Ferenczy A, Robitaille J, Guralnick M, Shatz R.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr 15; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.