These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

138 related items for PubMed ID: 8508881

  • 21. Collection devices for cervicovaginal cytology: a comparison.
    Dighe S, Ajit D.
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 16124171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
    Longatto Filho A, Maeda MY, Santos DR, de Andréa Filho A, Cavaliere MJ, Shih LW, Oyafuso MS.
    Rev Paul Med; 1991; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG, Sadeghi M, Fotheringham N, Semrad N, Watring WG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Exact Touch: a new device for cervical cytology. Comparison with Ayre spatula plus Cytobrush.
    de Palo G, Stefanon B, Alasio L, Pilotti S.
    Cytopathology; 2000 Oct; 11(5):322-5. PubMed ID: 11014659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Evaluation of smears obtained by cervical scraping and an endocervical swab in the diagnosis of neoplastic disease of the uterine cervix.
    Johansen P, Arffmann E, Pallesen G.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1979 Oct; 58(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 484218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.
    Martin-Hirsch P, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000 Oct; 2000(2):CD001036. PubMed ID: 10796736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Follow-up Papanicolaou smear for cervical atypia: are we missing significant disease? A HARNET Study.
    Slawson DC, Bennett JH, Herman JM.
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Mar; 36(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 8454975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
    Noel ML.
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989 Mar; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ, Johnson RA, McNicoll KE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
    Ferenczy A, Robitaille J, Guralnick M, Shatz R.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.