These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
298 related items for PubMed ID: 8511809
21. Husbands as decision-makers in relation to family size: East-West regional differentials in Turkey. Kulu I. Nufusbil Derg; 1990; 12():41-64. PubMed ID: 12283728 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women. Grady WR, Klepinger DH, Nelson-Wally A. Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(4):168-75. PubMed ID: 10435215 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Contraceptive method mix menu: providing healthy choices for women. Greenwell KF. World Health Stat Q; 1996; 49(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 9050186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Barriers to contraceptive use in Kenya. Kamau RK, Karanja J, Sekadde-Kigondu C, Ruminjo JK, Nichols D, Liku J. East Afr Med J; 1996 Oct; 73(10):651-9. PubMed ID: 8997845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Current status and future perspectives in male contraception. Costantino A, Cerpolini S, Perrone AM, Ghi T, Pelusi C, Pelusi G, Meriggiola MC. Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Jun; 59(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 17576406 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of men in contraceptive decision-making: current knowledge and future implications. Edwards SR. Fam Plann Perspect; 1994 Jun; 26(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 8033982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors affecting the use and non use of contraception. Utomo B, Alimoeso S, Park CB. Majalah Demografi Indones; 1983 Dec; 10(20):ii-19-48. PubMed ID: 12280177 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Dual-method use among an ethnically diverse group of women at risk of HIV infection. Riehman KS, Sly DF, Soler H, Eberstein IW, Quadagno D, Harrison DF. Fam Plann Perspect; 1998 Dec; 30(5):212-7. PubMed ID: 9782043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The World Fertility Survey: charting global childbearing. Lightbourne R, Singh S, Green CP. Popul Bull; 1982 Mar; 37(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 12311520 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Attitudes of males to contraception in a Kenyan rural population. Were EO, Karanja JK. East Afr Med J; 1994 Feb; 71(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 7925037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Determinants of spacing contraceptive use among couples in Mumbai: a male perspective. Balaiah D, Naik DD, Ghule M, Tapase P. J Biosoc Sci; 2005 Nov; 37(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 16221320 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family. Schor EL, American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on the Family. Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Are Latin American and Caribbean men irresponsible with regard to family planning? It is the couple who gets pregnant. Olivares D. Forum Fam Plan West Hemisph; 1988 Apr; ():13. PubMed ID: 12179854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Rural-urban differential in contraceptive use status in Bangladesh. Uddin MM, Kabir M, Choudhury SR, Ahmed T, Bhuyan MR. Rural Demogr; 1985 Apr; 12(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 12280829 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Invisible man: can global efforts raise a new generation of men who take family planning seriously? Diconsiglio JM. Family Plan World; 1994 Apr; ():10-1. PubMed ID: 12345752 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]