These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1143 related items for PubMed ID: 8517320

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography.
    Roubidoux MA, Helvie MA, Lai NE, Paramagul C.
    Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 7617856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Breast cancer detection with short-interval follow-up compared with return to annual screening in patients with benign stereotactic or US-guided breast biopsy results.
    Johnson JM, Johnson AK, O'Meara ES, Miglioretti DL, Geller BM, Hotaling EN, Herschorn SD.
    Radiology; 2015 Apr; 275(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25423143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Changing emphasis in breast diagnosis: the surgeon's role in evaluating mammographic abnormalities.
    Sterns EE.
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Mar; 184(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 9060928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Detection of bilateral breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in the Netherlands: a population-based study.
    Setz-Pels W, Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Voogd AC, Jansen FH, Hooijen MJ, Louwman MW.
    Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 21474705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.
    Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA.
    Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 11274556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program experience: use of needle core biopsy in the diagnosis of screening-detected abnormalities.
    Caines JS, Chantziantoniou K, Wright BA, Konok GP, Iles SE, Bodurtha A, Zayid I, Daniels C.
    Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 8539363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography.
    Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V.
    JAMA; 1996 Jul 03; 276(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8667536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Outcomes of recommendations for breast biopsies in women receiving mammograms from a county health van.
    Kann PE, Bradley C, Lane DS.
    Public Health Rep; 1998 Jul 03; 113(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 9475937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival.
    Blanchard K, Colbert JA, Puri D, Weissman J, Moy B, Kopans DB, Kaine EM, Moore RH, Halpern EF, Hughes KS, Tanabe KK, Smith BL, Michaelson JS.
    Cancer; 2004 Aug 01; 101(3):495-507. PubMed ID: 15274062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 58.