These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

230 related items for PubMed ID: 8520238

  • 1. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
    Lo L, Jordan J.
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Improving the yield of endocervical elements in a Pap smear with the use of the cytology brush.
    Ruffin MT, Van Noord GR.
    Fam Med; 1991 Jul; 23(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 1884932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG, Sadeghi M, Fotheringham N, Semrad N, Watring WG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
    Hoffman MS, Hill DA, Gordy LW, Lane J, Cavanagh D.
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A, De Marchi WG, Bell V, Nishikawa R.
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb 01; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison between the Accu-Pap device and the extended-tip wooden Ayre spatula for cervical cytology sampling.
    Stock RJ, Thurmond AI, Passmore A.
    Acta Cytol; 1988 Feb 01; 32(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 3376697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A trial of two methods of taking cervical smears: the Aylesbury spatula plus cytology brush compared to the Cervex broom.
    Sparrow MJ, Fauck R, Gupta RK.
    N Z Med J; 1997 Sep 26; 110(1052):356-8. PubMed ID: 9364178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA, Korhonen MO, Reeves KO, Irwin JF, Carter TS, Kaufman RH.
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug 26; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM, Blythe JG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct 26; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
    Harrison DD, Hernandez E, Dunton CJ.
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr 26; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
    Lellé RJ, Cordes A, Regidor M, Maier E, Flenker H.
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007 Apr 26; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
    Tyau L, Hernandez E, Anderson L, Heller P, Edmonds P.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov 26; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush.
    Taylor PT, Andersen WA, Barber SR, Covell JL, Smith EB, Underwood PB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov 26; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Acceptable quality cervical cytology taking: comparison of Cervex-brush and Cervex-mex methods].
    Ojeda Ortiz J, Muñoz Molina R, Pardo López M, Guevara Cruz M, Hernández Quijano T, Valencia Elizondo C, Hernández Valencia M.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2008 Jul 26; 76(7):381-5. PubMed ID: 18798438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Brush vs. spatula for cervical smears. Histologic correlation with concurrent biopsies.
    Chakrabarti S, Guijon FB, Paraskevas M.
    Acta Cytol; 1994 Jul 26; 38(3):315-8. PubMed ID: 8191818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.