These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

334 related items for PubMed ID: 8523317

  • 1. Skin closure using nylon and polydioxanone: a comparison of results.
    Edwards DJ, Elson RA.
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1995 Oct; 40(5):342-3. PubMed ID: 8523317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Abdominal wound closure: a controlled trial of polyamide (nylon) and polydioxanone suture (PDS).
    Leaper DJ, Allan A, May RE, Corfield AP, Kennedy RH.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Sep; 67(5):273-5. PubMed ID: 3931536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Wound infection following high saphenous ligation. A trial comparing two skin closure techniques: subcuticular polyglycolic acid and interrupted monofilament nylon mattress sutures.
    Corder AP, Schache DJ, Farquharson SM, Tristram S.
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1991 Apr; 36(2):100-2. PubMed ID: 1646881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A randomized trial between different suture materials (polydioxanone vs. poliglecaprone 25) and different suturing techniques (running subcuticular suture alone vs. with running horizontal mattress) in prevention of hypertrophic scar development in median sternotomy wound.
    Homvises B.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Aug; 97 Suppl 8():S88-94. PubMed ID: 25518299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Skin closure using staples and nylon sutures: a comparison of results.
    Stockley I, Elson RA.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1987 Mar; 69(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 3566131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Pain quantum and wound healing: a comparison of interrupted inversion PDS and standard nylon sutures in abdominal skin closure.
    Cassie AB, Chatterjee AK, Mehta S, Haworth JM.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1988 Nov; 70(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 2974694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparative study of median sternotomy and standard thoracotomy wound skin closure methods.
    Angelini GD, Passani SP, Kulatilake EN.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Feb; 33(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 2579462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Subcuticular Prolene or PDS for skin closure?
    Vipond MN, Higgins AF.
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1991 Apr; 36(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 2051429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Aesthetic comparison of wound closure techniques in a porcine model.
    Tritle NM, Haller JR, Gray SD.
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Nov; 111(11 Pt 1):1949-51. PubMed ID: 11801975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. PDS II (polydioxanone) is the monofilament suture of choice for subcuticular wound closure following breast biopsy.
    Johnstone AJ, John TG, Thompson AM, Charles MH, Dixon JM.
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Apr; 37(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 1377271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Subcuticular, continuous and mechanical skin closure: cosmetic results of a prospective randomized trial.
    Zwart HJ, de Ruiter P.
    Neth J Surg; 1989 Jun; 41(3):57-60. PubMed ID: 2501713
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A randomised comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for abdominal wound closure.
    Cameron AE, Parker CJ, Field ES, Gray RC, Wyatt AP.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1987 May; 69(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 3111339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Single-layer closure of a subcostal incision using a monofilament absorbable suture material--comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polyglyconate (Maxon)].
    Vracko J, Pegan V.
    Acta Chir Iugosl; 1989 May; 36(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 2496545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Skin closure. A prospective randomized study].
    Lundblad R, Simensen HV, Wiig JN, Niels Grüner OP.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1989 Apr 30; 109(12):1307-9. PubMed ID: 2660322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Randomized controlled trial comparing subcuticular absorbable suture with conventional interrupted suture for wound closure at elective operation of colon cancer.
    Tanaka A, Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, Okada K, Saito G.
    Surgery; 2014 Mar 30; 155(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 24439741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Aesthetic and functional efficacy of subcuticular running epidermal closures of the trunk and extremity: a rater-blinded randomized control trial.
    Alam M, Posten W, Martini MC, Wrone DA, Rademaker AW.
    Arch Dermatol; 2006 Oct 30; 142(10):1272-8. PubMed ID: 17043181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Skin closure in hip surgery: subcuticular versus transdermal. A prospective randomized study.
    Sakka SA, Graham K, Abdulah A.
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1995 Oct 30; 61(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 8571773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A prospective, randomized comparison of skin adhesive and subcuticular suture for closure of pediatric hernia incisions: cost and cosmetic considerations.
    Brown JK, Campbell BT, Drongowski RA, Alderman AK, Geiger JD, Teitelbaum DH, Quinn J, Coran AG, Hirschl RB.
    J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Jul 30; 44(7):1418-22. PubMed ID: 19573672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of various methods and materials for treatment of skin laceration by a 3-dimensional measuring technique in a pig experiment.
    Zeplin PH, Schmidt K, Laske M, Ziegler UE.
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 May 30; 58(5):566-72. PubMed ID: 17452845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Mechanical factors influencing the incidence of burst abdomen.
    Niggebrugge AH, Hansen BE, Trimbos JB, van de Velde CJ, Zwaveling A.
    Eur J Surg; 1995 Sep 30; 161(9):655-61. PubMed ID: 8541424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.