These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

267 related items for PubMed ID: 8523605

  • 1. Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients--is contrast angiography necessary? A morbidity analysis.
    Kuntz KM, Skillman JJ, Whittemore AD, Kent KC.
    J Vasc Surg; 1995 Dec; 22(6):706-14; discussion 714-6. PubMed ID: 8523605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Perioperative imaging strategies for carotid endarterectomy. An analysis of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in symptomatic patients.
    Kent KC, Kuntz KM, Patel MR, Kim D, Klufas RA, Whittemore AD, Polak JF, Skillman JJ, Edelman RR.
    JAMA; 1995 Sep 20; 274(11):888-93. PubMed ID: 7674503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Role of 0.5 T magnetic resonance and duplex ultrasonography in the imaging of stenotic and oblitertive changes in the carotid arteries].
    Hebrang A, Brinar V, Vidjak V, Grga A, Sarlija M, Sosa T, Tomac S, Drasković J.
    Lijec Vjesn; 2002 May 20; 124(5):129-33. PubMed ID: 12152411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Mandatory diagnostic angiography for carotid artery stenosis prior to carotid artery intervention.
    Makaryus AN, Phillips LM, Wright P, Freeman J, Green SJ, Ong L, Marchant D.
    J Interv Cardiol; 2009 Feb 20; 22(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 18973511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Quantitative assessment of carotid stenosis: comparison between Doppler ultrasound, spiral computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and digital angiography].
    Tiev KP, Sevestre MA, Reix T, Auquier M, Cabane J, Dehouck B, Jounaville F, Idy Perretti I, Sentou Y, Remond A, Pietri J.
    J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec 20; 25(5):325-331. PubMed ID: 11148393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
    Vanninen RL, Manninen HI, Partanen PK, Tulla H, Vainio PA.
    Neuroradiology; 1996 May 20; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
    Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, Di Paolo P, Saba L, Cavallo Marincola B, Zini C, Cartocci G, Di Mare L, Catalano C, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2012 Feb 20; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens.
    Netuka D, Ostrý S, Belsán T, Rucka D, Mandys V, Charvát F, Bradác O, Benes V.
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Jul 20; 152(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 20411283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.