These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
174 related items for PubMed ID: 8529341
1. Retention and caries preventive effects of a GIC and a resin-based fissure sealant. Arrow P, Riordan PJ. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Oct; 23(5):282-5. PubMed ID: 8529341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. One-year clinical evaluation of a Glass Carbomer fissure sealant, a preliminary study. Gorseta K, Glavina D, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Van Duinen RN, Skrinjaric I, Hill RG, Lynch E. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Jun; 22(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 25134364 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years. Chen X, Du MQ, Fan MW, Mulder J, Huysmans MC, Frencken JE. Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):554-60. PubMed ID: 22300651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fissure sealants: a 4-year clinical trial comparing an experimental glass polyalkenoate cement with a bis glycidyl methacrylate resin used as fissure sealants. Williams B, Laxton L, Holt RD, Winter GB. Br Dent J; 1996 Feb 10; 180(3):104-8. PubMed ID: 8746143 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer/resin-based hybrid materials used as pit and fissure sealants. de Luca-Fraga LR, Pimenta LA. Quintessence Int; 2001 Jun 10; 32(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 11491626 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of caries prevention with glass ionomer and composite resin fissure sealants. Oba AA, Dülgergil T, Sönmez IS, Doğan S. J Formos Med Assoc; 2009 Nov 10; 108(11):844-8. PubMed ID: 19933027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Retention of fissure sealants in young permanent molars affected by dental fluorosis: a 12-month clinical study. Hasanuddin S, Reddy ER, Manjula M, Srilaxmi N, Rani ST, Rajesh A. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Oct 10; 15(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 24737141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Survival Analysis of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-Based Sealant Retention: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study. Petrauskienė S, Saldūnaitė-Mikučionienė K, Narbutaitė J. Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 May 01; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 38792939 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparison of Fuji VII and a resin sealant in children at high and low risk of caries. Chen Xx, Liu Xg. Dent Mater J; 2013 May 01; 32(3):512-8. PubMed ID: 23719016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials. Amin HE. J Dent Hyg; 2008 May 01; 82(5):45. PubMed ID: 19055885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years. Forss H, Halme E. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Feb 01; 26(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9511837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical trial. Forss H, Saarni UM, Seppä L. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1994 Feb 01; 22(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8143437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a clinical study. Mejàre I, Mjör IA. Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Aug 01; 98(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 2144660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]