These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

697 related items for PubMed ID: 8530558

  • 1. Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments.
    Holmes AP, Blair RC, Watson JD, Ford I.
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 1996 Jan; 16(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 8530558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples.
    Nichols TE, Holmes AP.
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 Jan; 15(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 11747097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The bootstrap and cross-validation in neuroimaging applications: estimation of the distribution of extrema of random fields for single volume tests, with an application to ADC maps.
    Viviani R, Beschoner P, Jaeckle T, Hipp P, Kassubek J, Schmitz B.
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Oct; 28(10):1075-88. PubMed ID: 17266105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Statistical parametric mapping of hypoxic tissue identified by [(18)F]fluoromisonidazole and positron emission tomography following acute ischemic stroke.
    Markus R, Donnan GA, Kazui S, Read S, Hirano T, Scott AM, O'Keefe GJ, Tochon-Danguy HJ, Sachinidis JI, Reutens DC.
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jun; 16(2):425-33. PubMed ID: 12030827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Estimation of the probabilities of 3D clusters in functional brain images.
    Ledberg A, Akerman S, Roland PE.
    Neuroimage; 1998 Aug; 8(2):113-28. PubMed ID: 9740755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Activation detection in fMRI using a maximum energy ratio statistic obtained by adaptive spatial filtering.
    Hossein-Zadeh GA, Ardekani BA, Soltanian-Zadeh H.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 22(7):795-805. PubMed ID: 12906234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Non-normality and transformations of random fields, with an application to voxel-based morphometry.
    Viviani R, Beschoner P, Ehrhard K, Schmitz B, Thöne J.
    Neuroimage; 2007 Mar; 35(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 17222566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Robust estimation of the probabilities of 3-D clusters in functional brain images: application to PET data.
    Ledberg A.
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2000 Mar; 9(3):143-55. PubMed ID: 10739365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The quantitative evaluation of functional neuroimaging experiments: the NPAIRS data analysis framework.
    Strother SC, Anderson J, Hansen LK, Kjems U, Kustra R, Sidtis J, Frutiger S, Muley S, LaConte S, Rottenberg D.
    Neuroimage; 2002 Apr; 15(4):747-71. PubMed ID: 11906218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Quantile estimation to derive optimized test thresholds for random field statistics.
    Hinrichs H, Scholz M, Noesselt T, Heinze HJ.
    Neuroimage; 2005 Aug 01; 27(1):116-29. PubMed ID: 15955713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
    Bansal R, Peterson BS.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun 01; 49():101-115. PubMed ID: 29408478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Rank-order versus mean based statistics for neuroimaging.
    Rorden C, Bonilha L, Nichols TE.
    Neuroimage; 2007 May 01; 35(4):1531-7. PubMed ID: 17391987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Improving permutation test power for group analysis of spatially filtered MEG data.
    Chau W, McIntosh AR, Robinson SE, Schulz M, Pantev C.
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov 01; 23(3):983-96. PubMed ID: 15528099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Pixel-based statistical analysis by a 3D clustering approach: application to autoradiographic images.
    Zhao W, Wu C, Yin K, Young TY, Ginsberg MD.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jul 01; 83(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 16828919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.
    Gaile DP, Miecznikowski JC.
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr 19; 8():105. PubMed ID: 17445265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cluster mass inference via random field theory.
    Zhang H, Nichols TE, Johnson TD.
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan 01; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18805493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Statistical methods in neuroimaging with particular application to emission tomography.
    McColl JH, Holmes AP, Ford I.
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1994 Jan 01; 3(1):63-86. PubMed ID: 8044354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Estimating smoothness in statistical parametric maps: variability of p values.
    Poline JB, Worsley KJ, Holmes AP, Frackowiak RS, Friston KJ.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995 Jan 01; 19(5):788-96. PubMed ID: 7560327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A statistical method for the analysis of positron emission tomography neuroreceptor ligand data.
    Aston JA, Gunn RN, Worsley KJ, Ma Y, Evans AC, Dagher A.
    Neuroimage; 2000 Sep 01; 12(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 10944407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A nonparametric spatial scan statistic for continuous data.
    Jung I, Cho HJ.
    Int J Health Geogr; 2015 Oct 20; 14():30. PubMed ID: 26481724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.