These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

139 related items for PubMed ID: 8531157

  • 21. Fracture resistance of composite and amalgam cores retained by pins coated with new adhesive resins.
    Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Grant BE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jun; 67(6):752-60. PubMed ID: 1403855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars.
    Uyehara MY, Davis RD, Overton JD.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Jun; 24(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 10823086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations.
    Imbery TA, Burgess JO, Batzer RC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Jun; 126(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 7797731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Shear bond strengths of two composite core materials after using all-in-one and single-bottle dentin adhesives.
    Sen D, Akgüngör G.
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16011620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparison of shear bond strength of amalgam bonded to primary and permanent dentin.
    Mahdi S, Bahman S, Arghavan AB, Fatemeh M.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Jun; 26(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 18603732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. New developments in tooth restoration with amalgam.
    Devlin H.
    Dent Update; 1993 Jun; 20(1):21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 8330660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Strength of amalgam restorations bonded with Amalgambond.
    Ianzano JA, Mastrodomenico J, Gwinnett AJ.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8329154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Bonding fresh amalgam to existing amalgam: a shear and flexural strength study.
    Leelawat C, Scherer W, Chang J, Vijayaraghavan T, LeGeros J.
    J Esthet Dent; 1992 Feb; 4(2):46-9. PubMed ID: 1389342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The effect of different adhesive systems on the retention strength of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M, Moosavi H.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb 01; 9(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18264531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul 01; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A laboratory study of the Amalgambond Adhesive System.
    Hasegawa T, Retief DH, Russell CM, Denys FR.
    Am J Dent; 1992 Aug 01; 5(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 1290605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Shear bond strength of composite resin to fresh amalgam.
    Bichacho N, Pilo R, Brosh T, Berkovich M, Helft M.
    Oper Dent; 1995 Aug 01; 20(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 8700774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.