These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
117 related items for PubMed ID: 8533347
1. The influence of two spatially distinct primers and attribute priming on motion induction. Faubert J, Von Grünau M. Vision Res; 1995 Nov; 35(22):3119-30. PubMed ID: 8533347 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring the attentional speed-up in the motion induction effect. von Grünau M, Racette L, Kwas M. Vision Res; 1996 Aug; 36(16):2433-46. PubMed ID: 8917806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Distinguishing subcortical and cortical influences in visual attention. Subcortical attentional processing. Zackon DH, Casson EJ, Stelmach L, Faubert J, Racette L. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 9040469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Processing speed in the motion-induction effect. von Grünau M, Saikali Z, Faubert J. Perception; 1995 Feb; 24(5):477-90. PubMed ID: 7567424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychophysical evidence of differential latencies of colour inputs to motion perception. Rasmjou S, Hoffmann KP. Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(19):2519-25. PubMed ID: 7975291 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dichoptic reduction of the direction illusion is not due to binocular rivalry. Wiese M, Wenderoth P. Vision Res; 2010 Aug 23; 50(18):1824-32. PubMed ID: 20542055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Binocularity of early motion mechanisms: comments on Georgeson and Shackleton. Carney T, Shadlen MN. Vision Res; 1992 Jan 23; 32(1):187-91. PubMed ID: 1502805 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of colour, shape, and flash induced illusory line motion. Hamm JP. Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr 23; 79(3):911-928. PubMed ID: 28054275 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Interaction of stereo vision and optic flow processing revealed by an illusory stimulus. Grigo A, Lappe M. Vision Res; 1998 Jan 23; 38(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 9536354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Motion repulsion is monocular. Grunewald A. Vision Res; 2004 May 23; 44(10):959-62. PubMed ID: 15031088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Apparent motion can survive binocular rivalry suppression. Wiesenfelder H, Blake R. Vision Res; 1991 May 23; 31(9):1589-99. PubMed ID: 1949627 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Monocular occlusion cues alter the influence of terminator motion in the barber pole phenomenon. Lidén L, Mingolla E. Vision Res; 1998 Dec 23; 38(24):3883-98. PubMed ID: 10211381 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Stationary patterns suppress the perception of stroboscopic motion. Banta AR, Breitmeyer BG. Vision Res; 1985 Dec 23; 25(10):1501-5. PubMed ID: 4090284 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Retinal, attentional, and causal aspects of illusory-motion directionality. Hecht H. Psychol Res; 1995 Dec 23; 57(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 7708899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dichoptic activation of the early motion system. Carney T, Shadlen MN. Vision Res; 1993 Sep 23; 33(14):1977-95. PubMed ID: 8249314 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Illusory perception of gratings stimulating a small number of neurones. Virsu V, Rovamo J, Laurinen P. Vision Res; 1994 Dec 23; 34(24):3253-63. PubMed ID: 7863613 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]