These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

602 related items for PubMed ID: 8540481

  • 21. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L, Chen R, Yang Y, Ji G, Shen G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Early treatment of the Class III malocclusion with rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction.
    da Silva Filho OG, Magro AC, Capelozza Filho L.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Feb; 113(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 9484211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy.
    Kurt G, Uysal T, Yagci A.
    World J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Dentofacial and skeletal effects of two orthodontic maxillary protraction protocols: bone anchors versus facemask.
    Tabellion M, Lisson JA.
    Head Face Med; 2024 Oct 18; 20(1):60. PubMed ID: 39425193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.
    Cevidanes L, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA, De Clerck H.
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep 18; 80(5):799-806. PubMed ID: 20578848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Changes in dentofacial morphology in skeletal Class III children treated by a modified maxillary protraction headgear and a chin cup: a longitudinal cephalometric appraisal.
    Takada K, Petdachai S, Sakuda M.
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Jun 18; 15(3):211-21. PubMed ID: 8339762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Sagittal airway changes: rapid palatal expansion versus Le Fort I osteotomy during maxillary protraction.
    Cakirer B, Kucukkeles N, Nevzatoglu S, Koldas T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun 18; 34(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 21464152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Evaluation of maxillary protraction and fixed appliance therapy in Class III patients.
    Arman A, Ufuk Toygar T, Abuhijleh E.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug 18; 28(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 16731542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A comparative study of the effects of customized facemask therapy or headgear to the lower arch on the developing Class III face.
    Battagel JM, Orton HS.
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Dec 18; 17(6):467-82. PubMed ID: 8682163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Lee SH, Koh SD, Chung DH, Lee JW, Lee SM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr 01; 42(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 31750516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Soft tissue alterations following protraction approaches with and without rapid maxillary expansion.
    Bavbek NC, Tuncer BB, Tortop T.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014 Apr 01; 38(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 25095325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Siqueira DF, de Almeira RR, Janson G, Brandão AG, Coelho Filho CM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr 01; 131(4):447.e21-30. PubMed ID: 17418708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate in mixed dentition: cephalometric evaluation after completion of growth.
    Susami T, Okayasu M, Inokuchi T, Ohkubo K, Uchino N, Uwatoko K, Takahashi-Ichikawa N, Nagahama K, Takato T.
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2014 Sep 01; 51(5):514-24. PubMed ID: 24010865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Soft and hard tissue changes after maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage implant in treatment of Class III malocclusion].
    Meng Y, Liu J, Guo X, Deng K, Liu M, Zhou J.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun 01; 30(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 22768767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Long-term results of surgically-assisted maxillary protraction.
    Nevzatoğlu S, Küçükkeleş N.
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May 01; 30(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 24968642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Cephalometric variables predicting the long-term success or failure of combined rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy.
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul 01; 126(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 15224054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Maxillary features following protraction headgear therapy in skeletal Class III patients].
    Viteporn S, Mathurasai W.
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1990 Jul 01; 40(4):148-56. PubMed ID: 2074327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Correlation between skeletal changes by maxillary protraction and upper airway dimensions.
    Lee JW, Park KH, Kim SH, Park YG, Kim SJ.
    Angle Orthod; 2011 May 01; 81(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 21299388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and Class III malocclusion.
    Ren Y, Steegman R, Dieters A, Jansma J, Stamatakis H.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May 01; 23(5):2429-2441. PubMed ID: 30306334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Class III malocclusion treated with a 3D-printed hybrid hyrax distalizer combined with mentoplate using Alt-RAMEC protocol: A case report.
    Kathem SJ, Matras RC, Abbas SOM.
    J Orthod; 2024 Jun 01; 51(2):183-191. PubMed ID: 37392009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.