These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

84 related items for PubMed ID: 8550935

  • 1. Phonemic resetting versus postural adjustments in the speech of cochlear implant users: an exploration of voice-onset time.
    Lane H, Wozniak J, Matthies M, Svirsky M, Perkell J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3096-106. PubMed ID: 8550935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Changes in voice-onset time in speakers with cochlear implants.
    Lane H, Wozniak J, Perkell J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jul; 96(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 8064023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users.
    Svirsky MA, Lane H, Perkell JS, Wozniak J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1284-300. PubMed ID: 1401516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Acoustic and articulatory measures of sibilant production with and without auditory feedback from a cochlear implant.
    Matthies ML, Svirsky M, Perkell J, Lane H.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Oct; 39(5):936-46. PubMed ID: 8898248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB, Won JH, Moon IJ.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Oct; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Perception of acoustic speech features with single channel cochlear implants and hearing aids. A comparative analysis].
    Dillier N, Spillmann T.
    HNO; 1988 Aug; 36(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 3170279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject.
    van Hoesel RJ, Tong YC, Hollow RD, Clark GM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3178-89. PubMed ID: 8300953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates.
    Uchanski RM, Geers AE.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):90S-105S. PubMed ID: 12612484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults.
    Rousset A, Dowell R, Leigh J.
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Feb; 55 Suppl 2():S24-30. PubMed ID: 27160793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of changes in hearing status on speech sound level and speech breathing: a study conducted with cochlear implant users and NF-2 patients.
    Lane H, Perkell J, Wozniak J, Manzella J, Guiod P, Matthies M, MacCollin M, Vick J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Nov; 104(5):3059-69. PubMed ID: 9821349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH, Zhang F, Kadis DS, Houston LM, Samy RN, Smith ML, Dimitrijevic A.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.