These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 8554296

  • 1. Our experience with the Mainz pouch II: 40 patients; follow-up and complications.
    Pajor L, Kelemen Z.
    Ann Urol (Paris); 1995; 29(4):246-9. PubMed ID: 8554296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [The rectosigmoid pouch. The Mainz pouch II. Apropos of 73 cases].
    Fisch M, Mappes C, Klinkowski U, Hohenfellner R.
    Ann Urol (Paris); 1995; 29(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 8554295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Seven years experience with the Mainz pouch procedure.
    Fisch M, Wammack R, Hohenfellner R.
    Arch Esp Urol; 1992 Mar; 45(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 1567262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Colon pouch (Mainz III) for continent urinary diversion.
    Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Liatsikos EN, Sakelaropoulos G, Rödder K, Hohenfellner R, Fisch M.
    BJU Int; 2007 Jun; 99(6):1473-7. PubMed ID: 17346278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Experience in 100 patients with an ileal low pressure bladder substitute combined with an afferent tubular isoperistaltic segment.
    Studer UE, Danuser H, Merz VW, Springer JP, Zingg EJ.
    J Urol; 1995 Jul; 154(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 7776455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz Pouch II) in different age groups and with different techniques of ureteric implantation.
    Bastian PJ, Albers P, Haferkamp A, Schumacher S, Müller SC.
    BJU Int; 2004 Aug; 94(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 15291865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A modified sigma-rectum pouch (Mainz pouch II) technique: analysis of outcomes and complications on 220 patients.
    Hadzi-Djokic JB, Basic DT.
    BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):587-91. PubMed ID: 16469032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Mainz Pouch II technique: 10 years' experience.
    D'elia G, Pahernik S, Fisch M, Hohenfellner R, Thüroff JW.
    BJU Int; 2004 May; 93(7):1037-42. PubMed ID: 15142160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Critical evaluation of the problem of chronic urinary retention after orthotopic bladder substitution in women.
    Ali-El-Dein B, Gomha M, Ghoneim MA.
    J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):587-92. PubMed ID: 12131315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Le Bag orthotopic urinary diversion.
    Kolettis PN, Klein EA, Novick AC, Winters JC, Appell RA.
    J Urol; 1996 Sep; 156(3):926-30. PubMed ID: 8709365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Quality of life in patients with a modified Mainz-pouch II urinary diversion].
    Dzamić Z, Hadzi-Djokić J, Tulić C, Vuksanović A, Lalić N, Aćimović M, Janicić A, Durutović O.
    Acta Chir Iugosl; 1999 Sep; 46(1 Suppl):11-3. PubMed ID: 10951770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.