These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

197 related items for PubMed ID: 8562789

  • 1. Monocryl suture, a new ultra-pliable absorbable monofilament suture.
    Bezwada RS, Jamiolkowski DD, Lee IY, Agarwal V, Persivale J, Trenka-Benthin S, Erneta M, Suryadevara J, Yang A, Liu S.
    Biomaterials; 1995 Oct; 16(15):1141-8. PubMed ID: 8562789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
    Trimbos JB, Niggebrugge A, Trimbos R, Van Rijssel EJ.
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The pH dependence of monofilament sutures on hydrolytic degradation.
    Tomihata K, Suzuki M, Ikada Y.
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001 May; 58(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 11505425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT, Beltran KA, Green CW, Faulkner BC, Stiles BM, Stanimir GW, Traeland H, Fried GM, Brown HC, Edlich RF.
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996 May; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (Polydioxanone, Poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631).
    Molea G, Schonauer F, Bifulco G, D'Angelo D.
    Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 53(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10878837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. CAPROSYN*, another major advance in synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Pineros-Fernandez A, Drake DB, Rodeheaver PA, Moody DL, Edlich RF, Rodeheaver GT.
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2004 Mar; 14(5):359-68. PubMed ID: 15479151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate.
    Katz AR, Mukherjee DP, Kaganov AL, Gordon S.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Sep; 161(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 3898441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The role of superoxide ions in the degradation of synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Lee KH, Chu CC.
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Jan; 49(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10559743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB, Bitar H, Andreae PR, Martin LM, Finlay JB, Marquis F.
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable monofilament suture materials before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline.
    Tobias KM, Kidd CE, Mulon PY, Zhu X.
    Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):550-560. PubMed ID: 31599002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Comparative evaluation of tensile strength of absorbable threads Dexon and Maxon. Experimental studies].
    Kulak Z, Deja A, Tuszewski M.
    Polim Med; 1991 Apr; 21(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 1667692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Two-month longitudinal study of mechanical properties of absorbable sutures used in orthopedic surgery.
    Müller DA, Snedeker JG, Meyer DC.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Oct 12; 11(1):111. PubMed ID: 27729082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.
    Wüst DM, Meyer DC, Favre P, Gerber C.
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov 12; 22(11):1146-53. PubMed ID: 17084288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Martin S, Rampersad RM, Cahill AG, Macones GA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct 12; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Laparoscopic suturing: effect of instrument handling on suture strength.
    Bariol SV, Stewart GD, Tolley DA.
    J Endourol; 2005 Nov 12; 19(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 16283852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Duration of wound healing and tissue resistance as important criteria for selecting suture materials in colon surgery].
    Lünstedt B, Debus S.
    Chirurg; 1990 Oct 12; 61(10):717-9. PubMed ID: 2276302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of chemotherapy and heat on biomechanical properties of absorbable sutures.
    Lapointe S, Zhim F, Sidéris L, Drolet P, Célestin-Noël S, Dubé P.
    J Surg Res; 2016 Jan 12; 200(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 26505660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for intradermal skin closure in cats.
    Papazoglou LG, Tsioli V, Papaioannou N, Georgiadis M, Savvas I, Prassinos N, Kouti V, Bikiaris D, Hadzigiannakis C, Zavros N.
    Can Vet J; 2010 Jul 12; 51(7):770-2. PubMed ID: 20885834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC, Kizil Z.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar 12; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE, Patterson JA, Kamath R, Willett G, Ahmed SW, Butterfield AB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar 12; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.