These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 8567448

  • 21. Chirp-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Jedrzejczak WW, Kochanek K, Sliwa L, Pilka E, Piotrowska A, Skarzynski H.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 77(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 23116905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A, Collet L, Duclaux R.
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Souter M.
    Hear Res; 1995 Nov; 91(1-2):167-77. PubMed ID: 8647718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [The application of otoacoustic emissions measurement in the assessment of the function of cochlear efferent fibers: the study of normal hearing subjects].
    Kotyło P, Sliwińska-Kowalska M.
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1999 Nov; 53(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10337165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Concurrent measures of contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and of auditory steady-state responses.
    Mertes IB, Leek MR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):2027. PubMed ID: 27914370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ryan S, Kemp DT.
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8789819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children.
    Ugur AK, Kemaloglu YK, Ugur MB, Gunduz B, Saridogan C, Yesilkaya E, Bideci A, Cinaz P, Goksu N.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 19150138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in neonates.
    Durante AS, Carvalho RM.
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Jun; 41(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 12154810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Noise suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. A comparison with the non-linear method.
    Molenaar DG, Shaw G, Eggermont JJ.
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):197-207. PubMed ID: 10771197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Suppression effect of otoacoustic emissions in term and preterm infants.
    Jesus NO, Angrisani RG, Maruta EC, Azevedo MF.
    Codas; 2016 May; 28(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 27509398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B, Wit HP, Avan P.
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan 03; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The combined effects of forward masking by noise and high click rate on monaural and binaural human auditory nerve and brainstem potentials.
    Pratt H, Polyakov A, Bleich N, Mittelman N.
    Hear Res; 2004 Jul 03; 193(1-2):83-94. PubMed ID: 15219323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effect of subject task on contralateral suppression of click evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    de Boer J, Thornton AR.
    Hear Res; 2007 Nov 03; 233(1-2):117-23. PubMed ID: 17910996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates and effect of contralateral white noise stimulation.
    Franz B, Altidis P, Altidis B.
    Int Tinnitus J; 2000 Nov 03; 6(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 14689637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Transient otoacoustic emissions in the detection of olivocochlear bundle maturation.
    Gkoritsa E, Tsakanikos M, Korres S, Dellagrammaticas H, Apostolopoulos N, Ferekidis E.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Apr 03; 70(4):671-6. PubMed ID: 16198429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Characteristics of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOES) in neonates.
    Aidan D, Lestang P, Avan P, Bonfils P.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Jan 03; 117(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 9039476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Temporal suppression of the click-evoked otoacoustic emission level-curve.
    Verhulst S, Harte JM, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar 03; 129(3):1452-63. PubMed ID: 21428509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R, Freeman S, Sohmer H.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001 Mar 03; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP, Kilgore C.
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan 24; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK, Lutman ME.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Jan 24; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.