These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

175 related items for PubMed ID: 8568037

  • 1. Olivocochlear reflex assays: effects of contralateral sound on compound action potentials versus ear-canal distortion products.
    Puria S, Guinan JJ, Liberman MC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jan; 99(1):500-7. PubMed ID: 8568037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
    Kawase T, Liberman MC.
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Slow build-up of cochlear suppression during sustained contralateral noise: central modulation of olivocochlear efferents?
    Larsen E, Liberman MC.
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 19232534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Long-term sound conditioning increases distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes and decreases olivocochlear efferent reflex strength.
    Peng JH, Tao ZZ, Huang ZW.
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul 16; 18(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 17589320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A, Collet L, Duclaux R.
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb 16; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex inhibition of human cochlear nerve responses.
    Lichtenhan JT, Wilson US, Hancock KE, Guinan JJ.
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar 16; 333():216-224. PubMed ID: 26364824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of contralateral noise on distortion product latency in humans: is the medial olivocochlear efferent system involved?
    Giraud AL, Wable J, Chays A, Collet L, Chéry-Croze S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct 16; 102(4):2219-27. PubMed ID: 9348679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.
    Guinan JJ, Backus BC, Lilaonitkul W, Aharonson V.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec 16; 4(4):521-40. PubMed ID: 12799992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Impact of occupational noise on pure-tone threshold and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after one workday.
    Müller J, Janssen T.
    Hear Res; 2008 Dec 16; 246(1-2):9-22. PubMed ID: 18848612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B, Wit HP, Avan P.
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan 03; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Müller J, Janssen T, Zenner HP.
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan 03; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A multifrequency method for determining cochlear efferent activity.
    Luebke AE, Foster PK, Stagner BB.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Mar 03; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 12083721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in "central masking" in nonhuman primates.
    Smith DW, Turner DA, Henson MM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb 03; 107(2):933-41. PubMed ID: 10687702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Time course of the medial olivocochlear efferent effect on otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Moulin A, Carrier S.
    Neuroreport; 1998 Nov 16; 9(16):3741-4. PubMed ID: 9858389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise.
    Liberman MC.
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Nov 16; 60(5):1779-98. PubMed ID: 3199181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Measurement of medial olivocochlear efferent activity in humans: comparison of different distortion product otoacoustic emission-based paradigms.
    Wagner W, Heyd A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct 16; 32(8):1379-88. PubMed ID: 21921859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Separating the contributions of olivocochlear and middle ear muscle reflexes in modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emission levels.
    Wolter NE, Harrison RV, James AL.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014 Oct 16; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24335024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW, Butler BE, Saunders TJ, Allen P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct 16; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Ipsilateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emission: role of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Tavartkiladze GA, Frolenkov GI, Artamasov SV.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Mar 16; 116(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 8725517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Human medial olivocochlear reflex: effects as functions of contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral elicitor bandwidths.
    Lilaonitkul W, Guinan JJ.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep 16; 10(3):459-70. PubMed ID: 19263165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.