These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

142 related items for PubMed ID: 8573329

  • 61.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65. Differential recognition of tachistoscopically presented English and Hebrew words in right and left visual fields.
    Barton MI, Goodglass H, Shai A.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Oct; 21(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 5848913
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66. Components of asymmetrical visual encoding of geometrically transformed scripts.
    Cohen AS.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 1):755-65. PubMed ID: 876783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67. Right away: A late, right-lateralized category effect complements an early, left-lateralized category effect in visual search.
    Constable MD, Becker SI.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 28349383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69. Reliability and magnitude of visual laterality effects: the influence of attention.
    Voyer D.
    Laterality; 2001 Oct; 6(4):315-36. PubMed ID: 15513179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70. Comparison of aesthetic preferences among Roman and Arabic script readers.
    Heath RL, Mahmasanni O, Rouhana A, Nassif N.
    Laterality; 2005 Sep; 10(5):399-411. PubMed ID: 16191811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73. Reading direction influences lateral biases in letter processing.
    Ransley K, Goodbourn PT, Nguyen EHL, Moustafa AA, Holcombe AO.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1678-1686. PubMed ID: 29698039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77. The representation of discourse in the two hemispheres: an individual differences investigation.
    Prat CS, Long DL, Baynes K.
    Brain Lang; 2007 Mar; 100(3):283-94. PubMed ID: 17173964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78. Signal detection in a noisy background figure through a limited visual field.
    Saito S, Murase Y, Tsukahara S.
    Ergonomics; 1984 Jul; 27(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 6479145
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79. Contour effects and pattern preferences in infants: a reply to Greenberg and O'Donnell (1972).
    Karmel BZ.
    Child Dev; 1974 Mar; 45(1):196-9. PubMed ID: 4820274
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80. Visual form perception in deficient and normal readers as a function of age and orthographic-linguistic familiarity.
    Vellutino FR, Steger JA, Kaman M, De Setto L.
    Cortex; 1975 Mar; 11(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 1149463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.