These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

118 related items for PubMed ID: 8580128

  • 21. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Basis of radiation protection].
    Roth J, Schweizer P, Gückel C.
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jun 29; 126(26):1157-71. PubMed ID: 8711464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Importance of quality assurance program implementation in conventional diagnostic radiology.
    Surić Mihić M, Mestrović T, Prlić I, Surić D.
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Oct 29; 32 Suppl 2():181-4. PubMed ID: 19138023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
    Hawking N, Elmore A.
    Radiol Technol; 2009 Oct 29; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A model for image formation and image quality prediction in diagnostic radiology.
    Kandarakis I, Cavouras D, Koutsourakis C, Triantis D, Bakas A, Panayiotakis G, Nomicos C.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997 Oct 29; 43 Pt B():517-21. PubMed ID: 10179719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A, Bacher K, Smeets P, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Oct 29; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Radiation protection in diagnostic radiology].
    Mini R.
    Ther Umsch; 1992 Jun 29; 49(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 1636159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Quality assurance in dental radiography: intra-oral image quality analysis.
    Bolas A, Fitzgerald M.
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 1992 Jun 29; 54(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 19189748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR, Davies AG, Kengyelics SM.
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec 29; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kim MJ, Park CH, Choi SJ, Hwang KH, Kim HS.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 Dec 29; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Medical exposure from computed tomographic examination -a recommendation of dosimetry by film method-].
    Yasutomo M, Yagi H.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Dec 29; 22(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 12766285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ.
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov 29; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Assessment of patient organ dose in CT virtual colonoscopy for bowel cancer screening.
    Schopphoven S, Faulkner K, Busch HP.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Nov 29; 129(1-3):179-83. PubMed ID: 18453556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Update of diagnostic medical and dental x-ray exposures in Romania.
    Sorop I, Mossang D, Iacob MR, Dadulescu E, Iacob O.
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Dec 29; 28(4):563-71. PubMed ID: 19029586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Routine quality assurance and results of a diagnostic radiology quality assurance programme.
    Roberts PJ, Fisher K.
    Radiobiol Radiother (Berl); 1990 Dec 29; 31(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 2356302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Documentation and constancy evaluation of medical roentgen units. Direct radiography with digital image recording systems].
    Huber S.
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999 Dec 29; 52(7):238-43. PubMed ID: 10605326
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
    Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep 07; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM, Ordiales JM, Guibelalde E, Prieto C, Vano E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Sep 07; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Radiosensitivity of children: potential for overexposure in CR and DR and magnitude of doses in ordinary radiographic examinations.
    Don S.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct 07; 34 Suppl 3():S167-72; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography].
    Seifert H, Chapot C.
    J Radiol; 1999 Nov 07; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.