These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


118 related items for PubMed ID: 8580128

  • 41. [Quality assurance in x-ray diagnosis as specified in DIN 6868].
    Lenzen H, Wiesmann W.
    Radiologe; 1988 Jan; 28(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 3344348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. [Analysis of reject x-ray films as a quality assurance element in diagnostic radiology].
    Lewentat G, Bohndorf K.
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 9198508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. A quality control programme for medical X-ray films in India.
    Sharma R, Sharma SD.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 21345880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. [Experiences in the testing of standard data on roentgen diagnostic equipment].
    Klimpel H.
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Apr; 38(4):105-8. PubMed ID: 4001772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Physical and dosimetric aspects of diagnostic geometrical and computer-assisted tomographic procedures.
    McCullough EC, Coulam CM.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1976 Apr; 14(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 772748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. [Significance of imaging procedures in diagnosis in pediatrics. Introduction].
    Ball F.
    Monatsschr Kinderheilkd; 1986 Jun; 134(6):345-8. PubMed ID: 3748026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. From conventional radiology to diagnostic imaging: computed radiography.
    Vecchioli A, Campioni P, Cristofaro M, Macis G.
    Rays; 1992 Jun; 17(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 1480782
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Radiation Exposure in the NICU: Computed Radiography versus Digital Detector Radiography.
    Oberle R.
    Radiol Manage; 2015 Jun; 37(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 26710555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. [Benefit/risk considerations in diagnostic nuclear medicine].
    Schicha H, Wellner U.
    Nuklearmedizin; 1994 Aug; 33(4):155-66. PubMed ID: 7971291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. [The filmless hospital: reality or illusion].
    Hruby W.
    Rofo; 1995 May; 162(5):359-61. PubMed ID: 7772755
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. [Usefulness and risk of roentgen diagnosis. A contribution to quality assurance].
    Angerstein W.
    Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Sep; 48(9):261-6. PubMed ID: 7482047
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Image gently: using exposure indicators to improve pediatric digital radiography.
    Moore QT, Don S, Goske MJ, Strauss KJ, Cohen M, Herrmann T, Macdougall R, Noble L, Morrison G, John SD, Lehman L.
    Radiol Technol; 2012 Sep; 84(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 22988269
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.