These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1274 related items for PubMed ID: 8583467
21. An optical oscillometric method for neonatal and premature infant blood pressure monitoring. Roeder RA, Geddes LA. Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Apr; 9(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19363328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Wong SN, Tz Sung RY, Leung LC. Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements. Amoore JN, Lemesre Y, Murray IC, Mieke S, King ST, Smith FE, Murray A. J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors influencing the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients. Bur A, Herkner H, Vlcek M, Woisetschläger C, Derhaschnig U, Delle Karth G, Laggner AN, Hirschl MM. Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3):793-9. PubMed ID: 12626986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [A validation of the data obtained with the simultaneous recording of blood pressure and the 24-hour electrocardiogram]. Germanò G, Caparra A, Valentino S, Coia F, Federico L, Santucci A. Cardiologia; 1993 Jun; 38(6):383-92. PubMed ID: 8402748 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer versus the standard sphygmomanometer: an investigation of mechanisms. Kinirons MT, Maskrey VL, Lawson M, Swift CG, Jackson SH. J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Jul; 9(7):571-3. PubMed ID: 7562887 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of an indirect oscillometric blood pressure monitor in normotensive and hypotensive anesthetized dogs. Shih A, Robertson S, Vigani A, da Cunha A, Pablo L, Bandt C. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2010 Jun; 20(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 20636984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A preliminary evaluation of the mean arterial pressure as measured by cuff oscillometry. Smulyan H, Sheehe PR, Safar ME. Am J Hypertens; 2008 Feb; 21(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 18174881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of intra-arterial and automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement methods in postoperative hypertensive patients. Loubser PG. Med Instrum; 1986 Feb; 20(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 3784934 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device. Pavan MV, Saura GE, Korkes HA, Nascimento KM, Madeira Neto ND, Dávila R, Rodrigues CI, Almeida FA. J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement used for calibration of the arterial tonometry method contributes significantly to error. Hansen S, Staber M. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Sep; 23(9):781-7. PubMed ID: 16723049 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor. Beaubien ER, Card CM, Card SE, Biem HJ, Wilson TW. J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Sep; 16(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 12214262 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement. Landgraf J, Wishner SH, Kloner RA. Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug 01; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders? Hla KM, Vokaty KA, Feussner JR. Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec 01; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]