These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

143 related items for PubMed ID: 8588020

  • 1. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
    Martin D, Umpierre SA, Villamarzo G, Sánchez O, Sánchez J, Carrodeguas J, Adamsons K.
    P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
    Hoffman MS, Sterghos S, Gordy LW, Gunasekaran S, Cavanagh D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA, Korhonen MO, Reeves KO, Irwin JF, Carter TS, Kaufman RH.
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
    Hoffman MS, Hill DA, Gordy LW, Lane J, Cavanagh D.
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
    Lo L, Jordan J.
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
    Hunter V, Tseng P.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The significance of a negative Papanicolaou smear with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis.
    Andrews S, Miyazawa K.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):751-3. PubMed ID: 2704502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
    Harrison DD, Hernandez E, Dunton CJ.
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP, Dickinson K, d'Ablaing G, Schlaerth JB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The optimal technique for obtaining a Papanicolaou smear with the Cervex-Brush.
    Ferris DG, Berrey MM, Ellis KE, Petry LJ, Voxnaes J, Beatie RT.
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Mar; 34(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 1541953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Improved endocervical sampling and HPV viral load detection by Cervex-Brush Combi.
    Depuydt CE, Benoy IH, Bailleul EJ, Vandepitte J, Vereecken AJ, Bogers JJ.
    Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 17168921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
    Kim TJ, Kim HS, Park CT, Park IS, Hong SR, Park JS, Shim JU.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Assessment of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
    Linasmita V, Bullangpoti S, Rochanawutanon M, Bhamarapravati Y.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1990 Feb; 73 Suppl 1():28-32. PubMed ID: 2351911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Evaluation by colposcopy, biopsies, and endocervical curettage.
    Townsend DE, Ostergard DR, Mishell DR, Hirose FM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Oct 01; 108(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 5484600
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.