These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

202 related items for PubMed ID: 8593905

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Sensitometric comparison of Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed Dental Films.
    Thunthy KH, Weinberg R.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 7614149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H, Farman AG, Wakoh M, Nishikawa K, Kuroyanagi K.
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB, Platin E.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 7614148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
    Geist JR, Brand JW.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A laboratory evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray film.
    Horner K, Rushton VE, Shearer AC.
    J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 8530727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K, Velders XL, Sanderink GC, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
    Kaffe I, Littner MM, Kuspet ME.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A sensitometric comparison of four dental X-ray films and their diagnostic accuracy.
    Svenson B, Welander U, Shi XQ, Stamatakis H, Tronje G.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9442614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K, Velders XL, Sanderink GC, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Radiographic contrast. A comparative study of three dental X-ray films.
    Tamburus JR, Lavrador MA.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 9442609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.