These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

330 related items for PubMed ID: 8596819

  • 21. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years.
    Beiruti N, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, Taifour D, van Palenstein Helderman WH.
    Caries Res; 2006; 40(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16352882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Scanning electron microscope analysis of sealant penetration and adaptation in contaminated fissures.
    Al-Jobair A.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2013; 31(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 24021327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Bond strength measurements of fissure sealant to glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cement.
    Gray GB.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 7920406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999 Mar; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. In vitro evaluation of marginal leakage using invasive and noninvasive technique of light cure glass ionomer and flowable polyacid modified composite resin used as pit and fissure sealant.
    Singla A, Garg S, Jindal SK, Suma Sogi HP, Sharma D.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Mar; 22(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21891886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel.
    Irinoda Y, Matsumura Y, Kito H, Nakano T, Toyama T, Nakagaki H, Tsuchiya T.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Mar; 25(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 11203831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
    Ramos RP, Chinelatti MA, Chimello DT, Dibb RG.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. 2-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer sealant.
    Smales RJ, Wong KC.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Apr; 12(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 10477983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Frequency of remnants of sealants left behind in pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces after 2 and 3 years.
    Hu X, Zhang W, Fan M, Mulder J, Frencken JE.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):143-149. PubMed ID: 26961522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Marginal adaptation of pit and fissure sealants after thermal and chemical stress. A SEM study.
    Kantovitz KR, Pascon FM, Alonso RC, Nobre-dos-Santos M, Rontani RM.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 19146131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The effect of glass ionomer cement on the surface hardness of resin based materials.
    Kilpatrick NM, McCabe JF, Murray JJ.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):279-82. PubMed ID: 8603173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Surface topography and enamel-resin interface of pit and fissure sealants following visible light and argon laser polymerization: an in vitro study.
    Hicks MJ, Westerman GH, Flaitz CM, Powell GL.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000 Dec; 67(3):169-75, 160. PubMed ID: 10902074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The influence of Healozone on microleakage and fissure penetration of different sealing materials.
    Dukić W, Dukić OL, Milardović S.
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Mar; 33(1):157-62. PubMed ID: 19408619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of the retention and wear of a light-cured pit and fissure glass ionomer sealant.
    Aranda M, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995 Mar; 19(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 7547485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
    Gerdolle DA, Mortier E, Loos-Ayav C, Jacquot B, Panighi MM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations.
    Ferrari M, Davidson CL.
    Oper Dent; 1996 Jun; 21(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 8957921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
    Wilson RM, Donly KJ.
    Pediatr Dent; 2001 Jun; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. SEM and microleakage evaluation of 3 flowable composites as sealants without using bonding agents.
    Kwon HB, Park KT.
    Pediatr Dent; 2006 Jun; 28(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 16615375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of different materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants.
    Pardi V, Sinhoreti MA, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GM, Meneghim Mde C.
    Braz Dent J; 2006 Jun; 17(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 16721465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Efficiency of protective sealants for glass ionomer cements.
    Haddad D, Mount GJ, Makinson OF.
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):286-8. PubMed ID: 1299260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.