These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
123 related items for PubMed ID: 8604574
1. NeoPath, Inc. NeoPath AutoPap 300 Automatic Pap Screener System. Patten SF, Lee JS, Nelson AC. Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8604574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved quality-control detection of false-negative Pap smears using the Autopap 300 QC system. Marshall CJ, Rowe L, Bentz JS. Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Mar; 20(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 10086244 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: I. A prospective intended use study. Patten SF, Lee JS, Wilbur DC, Bonfiglio TA, Colgan TJ, Richart RM, Cramer H, Moinuddin S. Cancer; 1997 Dec 25; 81(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 9438458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Determining the utility and effectiveness of the NeoPath AutoPap 300 QC System used routinely. Fetterman B, Pawlick G, Koo H, Hartinger J, Gilbert C, Connell S. Acta Cytol; 1999 Dec 25; 43(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 9987444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. CytosafePLUS. A workstation for screening, supervision, reviewing, quality assurance and education in cytopathology. Vooijs GP, Nauwelaers FA, van Aspert-van Erp AJ. Acta Cytol; 1996 Jul 25; 40(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 8604581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of the AutoPap primary screening system at Jefferson University Hospital. Bibbo M, Hawthorne C. Acta Cytol; 1999 Jul 25; 43(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 9987446 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The primary screening clinical trials of the TriPath AutoPap System. Wilbur DC, Norton MK. Epidemiology; 2002 May 25; 13 Suppl 3():S30-3. PubMed ID: 12071481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated rescreening in cervical cytology. Mathematical models for evaluating overall process sensitivity, specificity and cost. Kaminsky FC, Benneyan JC, Mullins DL. Acta Cytol; 1997 May 25; 41(1):209-23. PubMed ID: 9022745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Proposed guidelines for secondary screening (rescreening) instruments for gynecologic cytology. Intersociety Working Group for Cytology Technologies. Acta Cytol; 1998 May 25; 42(1):273-6. PubMed ID: 9479352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-assisted quality assurance. Wied GL, Bartels PH, Bibbo M, Gupta PK, Gurley AM, Hilgarth M, Jiménez-Ayala M, Kato H, Knight BK, McGoogan E, Medley G, Meisels A, Nishiya I, Nozawa S, Ramzy I, Reith A, Rilke F, Rivera-Pomar JM, Rosenthal DL, Schenck U, Verhest AP, Vooijs GP. Acta Cytol; 1996 May 25; 40(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 8604561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of AutoPap system-assisted and manual cytologic screening. A comparison. Wertlake P. J Reprod Med; 1999 Jan 25; 44(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9987733 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]