These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

124 related items for PubMed ID: 860737

  • 1. Wave-form analysis of intrauterine pressure curves with methods and models developed in cardiac research.
    Barclay ML, DeHart W, Mercer JE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jun 01; 128(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 860737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Uterine contractility as assessed by abdominal surface recording of electromyographic activity in rats during pregnancy.
    Buhimschi C, Garfield RE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb 01; 174(2):744-53. PubMed ID: 8623816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part II. Contractions parameters].
    Zietek J, Sikora J, Horoba K, Matonia A, Jezewski J, Magnucki J, Kobielska L.
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov 01; 79(11):798-804. PubMed ID: 19140505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Monitoring uterine activity.
    Allman AC, Steer PJ.
    Br J Hosp Med; 2008 Nov 01; 49(9):649-53. PubMed ID: 8508259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Gondry J, Marque C, Duchene J, Cabrol D.
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993 Nov 01; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Contrasting effects of diethylenetriamine-nitric oxide, a spontaneously releasing nitric oxide donor, on pregnant rat uterine contractility in vitro versus in vivo.
    Buhimschi C, Buhimschi I, Yallampalli C, Chwalisz K, Garfield RE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep 01; 177(3):690-701. PubMed ID: 9322644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A computerized fetal monitoring system.
    Wade ME, Coleman PJ, White SC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Sep 01; 48(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 948372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Manometric evaluation of labor.
    Brown FB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Apr 01; 45(4):473-5. PubMed ID: 1121378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Working out a system for the parameters of intra-uterine pressure wave forms. A comparative study of spontaneous labour and induced labor (author's transl)].
    Querleu D, Biard F, Leblanc P, Smajda S, Verhaeghe Y, Cannet G, Crepin G.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1981 Apr 01; 10(7):661-9. PubMed ID: 7334192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.