These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

124 related items for PubMed ID: 8610315

  • 1. Variability in measurement of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis as displayed by both digital subtraction and magnetic resonance angiography: an assessment of three caliper techniques and visual impression of stenosis.
    Young GR, Humphrey PR, Nixon TE, Smith ET.
    Stroke; 1996 Mar; 27(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 8610315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    U-King-Im JM, Graves MJ, Cross JJ, Higgins NJ, Wat J, Trivedi RA, Tang T, Howarth SP, Kirkpatrick PJ, Antoun NM, Gillard JH.
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
    Vanninen RL, Manninen HI, Partanen PK, Tulla H, Vainio PA.
    Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer variability compared with selective catheter angiography.
    Lenhart M, Framme N, Völk M, Strotzer M, Manke C, Nitz WR, Finkenzeller T, Feuerbach S, Link J.
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Oct; 37(10):535-41. PubMed ID: 12352161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Elgersma OE, Wüst AF, Buijs PC, van Der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP.
    Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Sundgren PC, Sundén P, Lindgren A, Lanke J, Holtås S, Larsson EM.
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Further comments on the measurement of carotid stenosis from angiograms. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group.
    Eliasziw M, Smith RF, Singh N, Holdsworth DW, Fox AJ, Barnett HJ.
    Stroke; 1994 Dec; 25(12):2445-9. PubMed ID: 7974588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Prognostic value and reproducibility of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.
    Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Slattery J, Warlow CP.
    Stroke; 1994 Dec; 25(12):2440-4. PubMed ID: 7974587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis--effect of observer experience.
    Wardlaw JM, Lewis SC, Collie DA, Sellar R.
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Feb; 44(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 11942364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study.
    Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G.
    Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 9769818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
    Anzidei M, Napoli A, Marincola BC, Nofroni I, Geiger D, Zaccagna F, Catalano C, Passariello R.
    Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Young GR, Humphrey PR, Shaw MD, Nixon TE, Smith ET.
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1994 Dec; 57(12):1466-78. PubMed ID: 7798975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex scanning magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography: a comparative study].
    Guo D, Wang Y, Fu W.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 80(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11798743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
    Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Valentine RJ, Modrall JG, Smith S, Clagett GP.
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.