These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


111 related items for PubMed ID: 8612920

  • 21. The role of computerized tomography in dental implantology.
    Williams MY, Mealey BL, Hallmon WW.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 1289264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Fabrication of an implant radiologic-surgical stent for the partially edentulous patient.
    Espinosa Marino J, Alvarez Arenal A, Pardo Ceballos A, Fernandez Vazquez JP, Ibaseta Diaz G.
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 7568720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effect of over- and underexposure on the sharpness of the image of a marker in computer-assisted dental implant tomography.
    Thunthy KH.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12087446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. CT of the edentulous maxilla intended for osseo-integrated implants.
    Fjellström CA, Ström C.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1987 Feb; 15(1):45-6. PubMed ID: 3470316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone in the mandible.
    Lindh C, Nilsson M, Klinge B, Petersson A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jun; 25(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 9084263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Accurate presurgical determination for implant placement by using computerized tomography scan.
    Takeshita F, Suetsugu T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Dec; 76(6):590-1. PubMed ID: 8957782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Accurate three-dimensional pre-surgical planning and radiographic implant simulations.
    Franklin PD.
    Dent Implantol Update; 1992 Sep; 3(9):69-72. PubMed ID: 1364323
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: implications for dental implants. Part 1: Technique.
    Stella JP, Tharanon W.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990 Sep; 5(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2391135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Interactive computerized tomography for dental implants. Treatment planning from the prosthetic end result.
    Tischler M.
    Dent Today; 2004 Mar; 23(3):90, 92-3. PubMed ID: 15060916
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Guided Implant Surgical Applications.
    Tischler M.
    Dent Today; 2015 Dec; 34(12):60, 62. PubMed ID: 26749874
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The role of the radiologist in implantology.
    Stassa G.
    Implant Soc; 1991 Dec; 2(2):5-7, 16. PubMed ID: 1883901
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Computerized tomography and pre-implant assessment].
    Dagenais M.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1995 Nov; 61(11):1002-6. PubMed ID: 8521317
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Imaging for predictable maxillary implants.
    Duckmanton NA, Austin BW, Lechner SK, Klineberg IJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994 Nov; 7(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 8179788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A stent for presurgical evaluation of implant placement.
    Takeshita F, Tokoshima T, Suetsugu T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jan; 77(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 9029463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Use of a provisional restoration as a radiographic guide prior to implant placement.
    Rosner O, Gross M, Nissan J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):303-4. PubMed ID: 17052476
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.