These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

117 related items for PubMed ID: 8629563

  • 1. The minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Brotzman GL, Julian TM.
    Am Fam Physician; 1996 Mar; 53(4):1154-62. PubMed ID: 8629563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Gonzalez D, Hernandez E, Anderson L, Heller P, Atkinson BF.
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Bethesda System. A proposal for reporting abnormal cervical smears based on the reproducibility of cytopathologic diagnoses.
    Sherman ME, Schiffman MH, Erozan YS, Wacholder S, Kurman RJ.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Nov; 116(11):1155-8. PubMed ID: 1444745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Alanen KW, Elit LM, Molinaro PA, McLachlin CM.
    Cancer; 1998 Feb 25; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions and severe cervical combined lesions: predictive value of the papanicolaou smear.
    van Aspert-van Erp AJ, Smedts FM, Vooijs GP.
    Cancer; 2004 Aug 25; 102(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 15368312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY, Stanbridge EJ.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul 25; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison.
    Chacho MS, Mattie ME, Schwartz PE.
    Cancer; 2003 Jun 25; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Bethesda system for the reporting of cervical/vaginal cytology.
    Oren A, Fernandes J.
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 May 25; 91(5):476-9. PubMed ID: 2061103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation and management of the AGUS Papanicolaou smear.
    Kaferle JE, Malouin JM.
    Am Fam Physician; 2001 Jun 01; 63(11):2239-44. PubMed ID: 11417776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Follow-up of Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Howell LP, Davis RL.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb 01; 14(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8834072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions with coexisting squamous cell lesions.
    van Aspert-van Erp AJ, Smedts FM, Vooijs GP.
    Cancer; 2004 Aug 25; 102(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15368313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
    Kim TJ, Kim HS, Park CT, Park IS, Hong SR, Park JS, Shim JU.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May 25; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Information, discrimination and divergence in cytology. III. Optimization of classification of Papanicolaou smears.
    Okagaki T, Fujimura M, Zelterman D.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 May 25; 35(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 1994631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Bethesda system and evaluation of abnormal pap smears.
    Nguyen HN, Nordqvist SR.
    Semin Surg Oncol; 1999 May 25; 16(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 10225298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.
    Germain M, Heaton R, Erickson D, Henry M, Nash J, O'Connor D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug 25; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Diagnostic conization of the uterine cervix. I. Classification of histological diagnoses].
    Geissler U.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1977 Aug 25; 99(17):1025-7. PubMed ID: 919876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Cytological classification of precancer and cancer of the cervix uteri].
    Agamova KA, Nikitina NI, Gosh TE, Tikhomirova EE, Gladunova ZD.
    Vopr Onkol; 1987 Aug 25; 33(5):54-9. PubMed ID: 3590668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Where's the high-grade cervical neoplasia? The importance of minimally abnormal Papanicolaou diagnoses.
    Kinney WK, Manos MM, Hurley LB, Ransley JE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun 25; 91(6):973-6. PubMed ID: 9611007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.