These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

193 related items for PubMed ID: 8629917

  • 1. Intermodal agreement of follow-up telephone functional assessment using the Functional Independence Measure in patients with stroke.
    Smith PM, Illig SB, Fiedler RC, Hamilton BB, Ottenbacher KJ.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 May; 77(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 8629917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Telephone and in-person proxy agreement between stroke patients and caregivers for the functional independence measure.
    Segal ME, Gillard M, Schall R.
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 May; 75(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 8663929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure.
    Daving Y, Andrén E, Nordholm L, Grimby G.
    Clin Rehabil; 2001 Jun; 15(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 11386401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the FIM for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement community.
    Pollak N, Rheault W, Stoecker JL.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Oct; 77(10):1056-61. PubMed ID: 8857886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Short versions of the telephone motor Functional Independence Measure for use with persons with spinal cord injury.
    Dijkers MP, Yavuzer G.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1477-84. PubMed ID: 10569444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Predicting discharge destination of stroke patients using a mathematical model based on six items from the Functional Independence Measure.
    Mauthe RW, Haaf DC, Hayn P, Krall JM.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Jan; 77(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 8554464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Predicting patient scores between the functional independence measure and the minimum data set: development and performance of a FIM-MDS "crosswalk".
    Williams BC, Li Y, Fries BE, Warren RL.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 78(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 9014957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluating the FONE FIM: Part II. Concurrent validity & influencing factors.
    Chang WC, Chan C, Slaughter SE, Cartwright D.
    J Outcome Meas; 1997 Jan; 1(4):259-85. PubMed ID: 9661724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Agreement of functional independence measure item scores in patients transferred from one rehabilitation setting to another.
    Kohler F, Dickson H, Redmond H, Estell J, Connolly C.
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Dec; 45(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 20032905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM).
    Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV.
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1994 Sep; 26(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 7801060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Interrater reliability of the Functional Assessment Measure in a brain injury rehabilitation program.
    Donaghy S, Wass PJ.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Oct; 79(10):1231-6. PubMed ID: 9779676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Dependence and perceived difficulty in daily activities in community-living stroke survivors 2 years after stroke: a study of instrumental structures.
    Grimby G, Andrén E, Daving Y, Wright B.
    Stroke; 1998 Sep; 29(9):1843-9. PubMed ID: 9731606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The performance of a limited set of items from the Functional Independence Measure for use in acute trauma care and rehabilitation.
    Mortifee PR, Busser J, Anton HA.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 May; 77(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 8629918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Interview Functional Independence Measure score: self-reporting as a simpler alternative to multidisciplinary functional assessment.
    Vadassery SJ, Kong KH, Ho WML, Seneviratna A.
    Singapore Med J; 2019 Apr; 60(4):199-201. PubMed ID: 30182128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Can the modified functional independence measure be reliably obtained from the patient medical record by different raters?
    Gabbe BJ, Sutherland AM, Wolfe R, Williamson OD, Cameron PA.
    J Trauma; 2007 Dec; 63(6):1374-9. PubMed ID: 18212664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comorbidity measures for stroke outcome research: a preliminary study.
    Liu M, Domen K, Chino N.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Feb; 78(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 9041898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluating the FONE FIM: Part I. Construct validity.
    Chang WC, Slaughter S, Cartwright D, Chan C.
    J Outcome Meas; 1997 Feb; 1(3):192-218. PubMed ID: 9661721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the community-based elderly.
    Ottenbacher KJ, Mann WC, Granger CV, Tomita M, Hurren D, Charvat B.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Dec; 75(12):1297-301. PubMed ID: 7993167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Validity of the PULSES profile compared with the Functional Independence Measure for measuring disability in a stroke rehabilitation setting.
    Marshall SC, Heisel B, Grinnell D.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1999 Jul; 80(7):760-5. PubMed ID: 10414759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure.
    Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD.
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Apr; 72(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 8476548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.