These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

190 related items for PubMed ID: 8633144

  • 1. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT.
    Garcia PA, Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Liang L, Reinhold C, Atri M.
    Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 8633144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
    Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng SL, Peters TL, McGovern PC.
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR, Paushter DM, Einstein DM, Zepp R, Friedman RA, Obuchowski N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Effect of different threshold levels and injection rates on hepatic enhancement by using bolus tracking technique in helical CT].
    Erdoğan C, Savci G.
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Jun; 9(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 14661491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Hepatic dynamic sequential CT: section enhancement profiles with a bolus of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC, Moyers JH, Chezmar JL, Hoel MJ, Jones EC, Peterson JE, Cork RD, Bernardino ME.
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):499-502. PubMed ID: 1987614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase.
    Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M.
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 7480677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography.
    Sahani DV, Soulez G, Chen KM, Lepanto L, Xu JR, Nelson RC, Grazioli L, Vanzulli A, Heiken JP, Investigators of the IMPACT Study.
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):856-61. PubMed ID: 18007158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Uniform vascular contrast enhancement and reduced contrast medium volume achieved by using exponentially decelerated contrast material injection method.
    Bae KT, Tran HQ, Heiken JP.
    Radiology; 2004 Jun; 231(3):732-6. PubMed ID: 15163812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
    Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA.
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients.
    Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM, Dodd GD, Miller WJ.
    Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):721-5. PubMed ID: 8115618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT.
    Awai K, Inoue M, Yagyu Y, Watanabe M, Sano T, Nin S, Koike R, Nishimura Y, Yamashita Y.
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 15486215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
    Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, Sagel SS, Forman HP, DiCroce J.
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 8475268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
    Small WC, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME, Brummer LT.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols.
    Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE, Yin D.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hepatic CT enhancement. Part II. Alterations in contrast material volume and rate of injection within the same patients.
    Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM.
    Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):518-22. PubMed ID: 7972771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose.
    Bae KT, Shah AJ, Shang SS, Wang JH, Chang S, Kanematsu M, Hildebolt CF.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1589-94. PubMed ID: 18941106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Hepatic CT enhancement. Part I. Alterations in the volume of contrast material within the same patients.
    Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM.
    Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):513-7. PubMed ID: 7972770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Variation of the time to aortic enhancement of fixed-duration versus fixed-rate injection protocols.
    Kim MJ, Chung YE, Kim KW, Chung JJ, Lim JS, Oh YT, Kim JH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 16357400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.