These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

190 related items for PubMed ID: 8639235

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored by different FRC posts: an in vitro study.
    Torabi K, Fattahi F.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 19884709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of remaining dentine structure and thermal-mechanical aging on the fracture resistance of bovine roots with different post and core systems.
    Marchi GM, Mitsui FH, Cavalcanti AN.
    Int Endod J; 2008 Nov; 41(11):969-76. PubMed ID: 19133086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of post system and length on the strain and fracture resistance of root filled bovine teeth.
    Santos-Filho PC, Castro CG, Silva GR, Campos RE, Soares CJ.
    Int Endod J; 2008 Jun; 41(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 18422584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fracture resistance of crowned incisors with different post systems and luting agents.
    Gu XH, Kern M.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 17168934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with different heights of crown ferrule restored with prefabricated carbon fiber post and composite resin core by intermittent loading.
    de Oliveira JA, Pereira JR, Lins do Valle A, Zogheib LV.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):e52-7. PubMed ID: 18718775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
    Balbosh A, Kern M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns.
    Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S.
    Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 16171857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts.
    Naumann M, Preuss A, Frankenberger R.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 16464492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study.
    Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001 Feb; 14(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 11842907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.